Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;32(7):3813-3823.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.039. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

External Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Using Biparametric MRI and Its Simulated Integration with Conventional PI-RADS for Prostate Cancer Detection

Affiliations

External Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Using Biparametric MRI and Its Simulated Integration with Conventional PI-RADS for Prostate Cancer Detection

Mason J Belue et al. Acad Radiol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Prostate imaging reporting and data systems (PI-RADS) experiences considerable variability in inter-reader performance. Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms were suggested to provide comparable performance to PI-RADS for assessing prostate cancer (PCa) risk, albeit tested in highly selected cohorts. This study aimed to assess an AI algorithm for PCa detection in a clinical practice setting and simulate integration of the AI model with PI-RADS for assessment of indeterminate PI-RADS 3 lesions.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study externally validated a biparametric MRI-based AI model for PCa detection in a consecutive cohort of patients who underwent prostate MRI and subsequently targeted and systematic prostate biopsy at a urology clinic between January 2022 and March 2024. Radiologist interpretations followed PI-RADS v2.1, and biopsies were conducted per PI-RADS scores. The previously developed AI model provided lesion segmentations and cancer probability maps which were compared to biopsy results. Additionally, we conducted a simulation to adjust biopsy thresholds for index PI-RADS category 3 studies, where AI predictions within these studies upgraded them to PI-RADS category 4.

Results: Among 144 patients with a median age of 70 years and PSA density of 0.17ng/mL/cc, AI's sensitivity for detection of PCa (86.6%) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa, 88.4%) was comparable to radiologists (85.7%, p=0.84, and 89.5%, p=0.80, respectively). The simulation combining radiologist and AI evaluations improved clinically significant PCa sensitivity by 5.8% (p=0.025). The combination of AI, PI-RADS and PSA density provided the best diagnostic performance for csPCa (area under the curve [AUC]=0.76).

Conclusion: The AI algorithm demonstrated comparable PCa detection rates to PI-RADS. The combination of AI with radiologist interpretation improved sensitivity and could be instrumental in assessment of low-risk and indeterminate PI-RADS lesions. The role of AI in PCa screening remains to be further elucidated.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Research-based clinical deployment of artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate MRI.
    Harmon SA, Tetreault J, Esengur OT, Qin M, Yilmaz EC, Chang V, Yang D, Xu Z, Cohen G, Plum J, Sherif T, Levin R, Schmidt-Richberg A, Thompson S, Coons S, Chen T, Choyke PL, Xu D, Gurram S, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Turkbey B. Harmon SA, et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05014-7. Online ahead of print. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025. PMID: 40418374

Publication types