Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug 1;117(8):1614-1626.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf084.

Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION)

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION)

Rauand Duhoky et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery, with laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches commonly employed. While robot-assisted surgery may offer technical advantages, there is limited evidence comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques, particularly in Western European populations. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Methods: This multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study included 1749 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted total mesorectal excision from January 2014 to January 2024. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to minimize confounding. Primary outcomes were length of stay, operative time, and conversion rates. Secondary outcomes included complications and pathological outcomes within 90 days, and readmissions and reinterventions within 30 days.

Results: The final cohort included 680.9 laparoscopic and 1057.5 robot-assisted cases after weighting. Robot-assisted surgery showed lower conversion rates (6.1% vs 3.5%, P = .025), higher rates of primary anastomosis (80.1% vs 92.1%, P < .001), and fewer stoma formations (78.4% vs 63.7%, P < .001). Pathological outcomes indicated a higher rate of complete mesorectal excision in the robot-assisted group (77.2% vs 86.0%, P < .001), though these data were not available for all centers. Operative time was longer in the robot-assisted cohort (181.0 vs 220.0 minutes, P < .001), but no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, length of stay, anastomotic leakage, or 30-day reintervention rates.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery low anterior resection demonstrated improved short-term outcomes with lower conversion rates, higher rates of complete mesorectal excision, and higher restorative procedure rates, which may influence longer term oncological and patient quality of life outcomes.

Trial registration: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN75281193.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources