Predicting VO2max Using Lung Function and Three-Dimensional (3D) Allometry Provides New Insights into the Allometric Cascade (M0.75)
- PMID: 40223039
- DOI: 10.1007/s40279-025-02208-3
Predicting VO2max Using Lung Function and Three-Dimensional (3D) Allometry Provides New Insights into the Allometric Cascade (M0.75)
Abstract
Background: Using directly measured cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e. VO2max) in epidemiological/population studies is rare due to practicality issues. As such, predicting VO2max is an attractive alternative. Most equations that predict VO2max adopt additive rather than multiplicative models despite evidence that the latter provides superior fits and more biologically interpretable models. Furthermore, incorporating some but not all confounding variables may lead to inflated mass exponents (∝ M0.75) as in the allometric cascade.
Objective: Hence, the purpose of the current study was to develop multiplicative, allometric models to predict VO2max incorporating most well-known, but some less well-known confounding variables (FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s) that might provide a more dimensionally valid model (∝ M2/3) originally proposed by Astrand and Rodahl.
Methods: We adopted the following three-dimensional multiplicative allometric model for VO2max (l⋅min-1) = Mk1·HTk2·WCk3·exp(a + b·age + c·age2 + d·%fat)·ε, (M, body mass; HT, height; WC, waist circumference; %fat, percentage body fat). Model comparisons (goodness-of-fit) between the allometric and equivalent additive models was assessed using the Akaike information criterion plus residual diagnostics. Note that the intercept term 'a' was allowed to vary for categorical fixed factors such as sex and physical inactivity.
Results: Analyses revealed that significant predictors of VO2max were physical inactivity, M, WC, age2, %fat, plus FVC, FEV1. The body-mass exponent was k1 = 0.695 (M0.695), approximately∝M2/3. However, the calculated effect-sizes identified age2 and physical inactivity, not mass, as the strongest predictors of VO2max. The quality-of-fit of the allometric models were superior to equivalent additive models.
Conclusions: Results provide compelling evidence that multiplicative allometric models incorporating FVC and FEV1 are dimensionally and theoretically superior at predicting VO2max(l⋅min-1) compared with additive models. If FVC and FEV1 are unavailable, a satisfactory model was obtained simply by using HT as a surrogate.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Funding: No financial support was received when conducting this study, or for the preparation or publication of this manuscript. Conflict of Interest: There were no conflicts of interest for specific or individual authors. Ethics Approval: Participating CPX laboratories were responsible for obtaining local institutional review board approval for inclusion in FRIEND, providing documentation that they were authorised to submit deidentified, coded data to the coordinating centre at Ball State University, which then forwarded these data to the core CPX laboratory housed at the University of Illinois, Chicago. Institutional review board approval for the core CPX laboratory was also obtained at the University of Illinois, Chicago. Data Sharing Statement: Access to the FRIENDS database is possible at www.cardiology.org . Author Contributions: Alan M. Nevill—Lead author; substantial contribution of the intellectual content of the manuscript including statistical analysis and interpretation of the data. Matthew Wyon—Substantial contribution drafting and revising intellectual content of the manuscript including interpretation of the data, formatting the manuscript, final approval of submitted version. Jonathan Myers—Substantial contribution revising intellectual content of the manuscript including interpretation of the data, final approval of submitted version. Matthew P. Harber—Substantial contribution revising intellectual content of the manuscript including interpretation of the data, final approval of submitted version. Ross Arena—Substantial contribution revising intellectual content of the manuscript including interpretation of the data, final approval of submitted version. Tony D. Myers—Substantial contribution revising intellectual content of the manuscript including analysis and preparation of figures and tables, final approval of submitted version. Leonard A. Kaminsky—Substantial contribution revising intellectual content of the manuscript including interpretation of the data, access to dataset, final approval of submitted version.
References
-
- Nevill AM, Myers J, Kaminsky LA, Arena R. Improving reference equations for cardiorespiratory fitness using multiplicative allometric rather than additive linear models: data from the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database Registry. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;62(6):515–21. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
