Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 17;64(25):e202504143.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202504143. Epub 2025 May 7.

Photoelectrochemical Iron(III) Catalysis for Late-Stage C─H Fluoroalkylations

Affiliations

Photoelectrochemical Iron(III) Catalysis for Late-Stage C─H Fluoroalkylations

Vladimir Motornov et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Chemo- and site-selective functionalization of complex molecules poses a fundamental challenge. Herein, we introduce a resource-economic photoelectrocatalysis strategy to enable versatile direct fluoroalkylations catalyzed by Earth-abundant iron and paired with the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Notably, the devised approach proved amenable to versatile late-stage C─H fluoroalkylations of bio-relevant heterocycles, such as xanthines, nucleobases, and nucleosides. Mechanistic studies supported a ligand-to-metal charge transfer-induced formation of the fluoroalkyl radical.

Keywords: C─H Functionalization; Electrophotochemistry; Fluoroalkylation; Iron catalysis; Sustainable chemistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Motivation and strategy for the late‐stage C─H fluoroalkylation. a) Natural abundance of iron and other transition metals in comparison. b) Representative fluoroalkyl‐containing compounds with pharmaceutical relevance. c) Beneficial effects of fluoroalkyl‐substitution on pharmacological properties. d) Lipophilicity indexes log P(o/w) for selected fluoroalkyl radicals. Calculations were performed at the ωB97X‐D + SMD(Octanol or Water)/def2‐QZVPP//ωB97X‐D/def2‐TZVPP level of theory (top) and calculated relative nucleophilicity of different fluoroalkyl radicals at the ωB97X‐D + SMD(Acetonitrile)/def2‐QZVPP//ωB97X‐D/def2‐TZVPP level of theory. Values take the malononitrile radical as reference (bottom). e) Electrochemical approaches to C─H fluoroalkylation using sulfinate and carboxylic acid reagents, and this work: Late‐stage C─H fluoroalkylations of complex biomolecules and drug compounds enabled by photoelectrochemical iron(III)‐catalysis. PC = photocatalyst, RF = fluoroalkyl group ‐CF2Alk, FTO = fluorine‐doped tin oxide glass. CCE = constant current electrolysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptualization and development of ferra‐photoelectrocatalysis. a) Mechanism manifold for homogenous photoelectrochemical C─H fluoroalkylation. b) Model reaction and control experiments. Reaction conditions: Undivided cell, heteroarene 1a (0.30 mmol), fluorinated carboxylic acid 2a (0.90 mmol), Fe(ClO4)3•10H2O (0.06 mmol), LiClO4 (0.067 M), MeCN (3 mL), glassy carbon anode (GC) and platinum plate cathode (Pt), CCE at 4.0 mA, 390 nm light irradiation, 1000 rpm stirring rate. [a] Yields were determined by 19F NMR with PhCF3 as internal standard; isolated yields are shown in parenthesis. c) Detection of molecular hydrogen via GC‐TCD headspace analysis (top) and quantitative monitoring of gas evolution (bottom). d) Kinetic analysis with substrate 1a and 2a revealing the current as rate limiting factor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Studies of the LMCT process. a) Cyclic voltammetry curves of a model reaction under standard conditions (left) and CV studies on complexation of Fe(III) salt with carboxylic acid: Undivided cell, caffeine 1a (0.30 mmol), fluorinated carboxylic acid 2a (0.90 mmol), Fe(ClO4)3•10H2O (0.06 mmol), LiClO4 (0.067 M), MeCN (3 mL). b) UV/Vis spectra of the model reaction. c) Radical trap experiments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Robustness of homogenous ferra‐photoelectrocatalysis. a) Fluoroalkyl versatility. b) Assessment of chemo‐ and site‐selectivity. Reaction conditions: Undivided cell, heteroarene 1 (0.30 mmol), fluorinated carboxylic acid 2 (0.90 mmol), Fe(ClO4)3•10H2O (0.06 mmol), LiClO4 (0.067 M), MeCN (3 mL), glassy carbon anode (GC) and platinum plate cathode (Pt), 6–12 h. CCE at 4.0 mA, 390 nm light irradiation, 1000 rpm stirring rate. Isolated yields. [a] n‐Bu4NBF4 (0.1 M) as supporting electrolyte, 36 h. [b] GF anode. [c] Reaction time 18 h. [d] DMSO/H2O (2:1) as a solvent. [e] CPE at 1.5 V; reaction time 30 h.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Late‐stage C─H fluoroalkylation. a) Compatibility with diverse nucleosides und nucleoside analogs. b) Selective direct fluoroalkylation of unprotected uridine‐5′‐monophosphate (UMP). Reaction conditions: Undivided cell, heteroarene 1 (0.30 mmol), fluorinated carboxylic acid 2 (0.90–1.20 mmol), Fe(ClO4)3•10H2O (0.06 mmol), LiClO4 (0.20–0.30 mmol), DMSO/H2O (2:1 v/v, 3 mL), glassy carbon anode (GC) and platinum plate cathode (Pt), 6–12 h. CCE at 4.0 mA, 390 nm light irradiation, 1000 rpm stirring rate. Isolated yields. [a] n‐Bu4NBF4 (0.1 M) as supporting electrolyte, 36 h. [b] 19F NMR yield with PhCF3 as internal standard in parenthesis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Cheng X., Lei A., Mei T.‐S., Xu H.‐C., Xu K., Zeng C., CCS Chem 2022, 4, 1120–1152.
    1. Liu J., Lu L., Wood D., Lin S., ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 1317–1340. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang H., Steiniger K. A., Lambert T. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12567–12583. - PubMed
    1. Terrett J. A., Cuthbertson J. D., Shurtleff V. W., MacMillan D. W. C., Nature 2015, 524, 330–334. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Day C. S., Renteria‐Gomez A., Ton S. J., Gogoi A. R., Gutierrez O., Martin R., Nat. Catal. 2023, 6, 244–253. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources