Efficacy and Safety of Zimlovisertib, Ritlecitinib, and Tofacitinib, Alone and in Combination, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
- PMID: 40223599
- DOI: 10.1002/art.43184
Efficacy and Safety of Zimlovisertib, Ritlecitinib, and Tofacitinib, Alone and in Combination, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zimlovisertib (interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 inhibitor) in combination with ritlecitinib (a JAK3 and tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [TEC] kinase family inhibitors) or tofacitinib (a JAK inhibitor) versus tofacitinib alone.
Methods: This phase 2 study randomized patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis to zimlovisertib 400 mg + tofacitinib 11 mg, zimlovisertib 400 mg + ritlecitinib 100 mg, zimlovisertib 400 mg, ritlecitinib 100 mg, or tofacitinib 11 mg (4:4:3:3:4) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored.
Results: Overall, 460 patients were randomized. At week 12, zimlovisertib + tofacitinib demonstrated a greater magnitude of mean CFB in DAS28-CRP (-2.65; 90% confidence interval [CI], -2.84 to -2.46) versus tofacitinib (-2.30; 90% CI, -2.49 to -2.11; P = 0.032); mean CFB with zimlovisertib + ritlecitinib (-2.35; 90% CI, -2.54 to -2.15) was similar to tofacitinib. TEAEs were reported in 246 patients (53.5%), with the highest aggregate incidence of TEAEs in the tofacitinib group (n = 60 [58.8%]). Most TEAEs were mild; severe TEAEs were reported by 9 patients (2.0%) and 10 patients reported serious AEs. One patient receiving tofacitinib died because of severe COVID-19 infection. Safety profiles were similar across all treatment groups, with no evidence of additive/synergistic issues.
Conclusion: Zimlovisertib + tofacitinib was more effective than tofacitinib for the primary endpoint, whereas the efficacy of zimlovisertib + ritlecitinib did not achieve statistical significance versus tofacitinib. All treatments were well tolerated.
© 2025 American College of Rheumatology.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Guo Q, Wang Y, Xu D, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathological mechanisms and modern pharmacologic therapies. Bone Res 2018;6:15.
-
- Rheumatoid Arthritis Collaborators GBD; GBD 2021 Rheumatoid Arthritis Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis, 1990‐2020, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol 2023;5(10):e594–e610.
-
- Einarsson JT, Willim M, Ernestam S, et al. Prevalence of sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis: impact of criteria sets and disease duration, a nationwide study in Sweden. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58(2):227–236.
-
- Sun X, Li R, Cai Y, et al; APLAR RA SIG group. Clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis in a multicenter real‐world study in Asia‐Pacific region. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2021;15:100240.
-
- Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021;73(7):924–939.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous