Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Oct;77(10):1337-1348.
doi: 10.1002/art.43184. Epub 2025 May 25.

Efficacy and Safety of Zimlovisertib, Ritlecitinib, and Tofacitinib, Alone and in Combination, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Zimlovisertib, Ritlecitinib, and Tofacitinib, Alone and in Combination, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

Spencer I Danto et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zimlovisertib (interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 inhibitor) in combination with ritlecitinib (a JAK3 and tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [TEC] kinase family inhibitors) or tofacitinib (a JAK inhibitor) versus tofacitinib alone.

Methods: This phase 2 study randomized patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis to zimlovisertib 400 mg + tofacitinib 11 mg, zimlovisertib 400 mg + ritlecitinib 100 mg, zimlovisertib 400 mg, ritlecitinib 100 mg, or tofacitinib 11 mg (4:4:3:3:4) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored.

Results: Overall, 460 patients were randomized. At week 12, zimlovisertib + tofacitinib demonstrated a greater magnitude of mean CFB in DAS28-CRP (-2.65; 90% confidence interval [CI], -2.84 to -2.46) versus tofacitinib (-2.30; 90% CI, -2.49 to -2.11; P = 0.032); mean CFB with zimlovisertib + ritlecitinib (-2.35; 90% CI, -2.54 to -2.15) was similar to tofacitinib. TEAEs were reported in 246 patients (53.5%), with the highest aggregate incidence of TEAEs in the tofacitinib group (n = 60 [58.8%]). Most TEAEs were mild; severe TEAEs were reported by 9 patients (2.0%) and 10 patients reported serious AEs. One patient receiving tofacitinib died because of severe COVID-19 infection. Safety profiles were similar across all treatment groups, with no evidence of additive/synergistic issues.

Conclusion: Zimlovisertib + tofacitinib was more effective than tofacitinib for the primary endpoint, whereas the efficacy of zimlovisertib + ritlecitinib did not achieve statistical significance versus tofacitinib. All treatments were well tolerated.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Guo Q, Wang Y, Xu D, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathological mechanisms and modern pharmacologic therapies. Bone Res 2018;6:15.
    1. Rheumatoid Arthritis Collaborators GBD; GBD 2021 Rheumatoid Arthritis Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis, 1990‐2020, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol 2023;5(10):e594–e610.
    1. Einarsson JT, Willim M, Ernestam S, et al. Prevalence of sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis: impact of criteria sets and disease duration, a nationwide study in Sweden. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58(2):227–236.
    1. Sun X, Li R, Cai Y, et al; APLAR RA SIG group. Clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis in a multicenter real‐world study in Asia‐Pacific region. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2021;15:100240.
    1. Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021;73(7):924–939.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding