Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May;49(4):414-427.
doi: 10.1002/jpen.2756. Epub 2025 Apr 14.

GLIM consensus approach to diagnosis of malnutrition: A 5-year update

Affiliations
Review

GLIM consensus approach to diagnosis of malnutrition: A 5-year update

Gordon L Jensen et al. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) introduced an approach for malnutrition diagnosis in 2019 that comprised screening followed by assessment of three phenotypic criteria (weight loss, low body mass index [BMI], and low muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake/assimilation and inflammation/disease burden). This planned update reconsiders the GLIM framework based on published knowledge and experience over the past 5 years.

Methods: A working group (n = 43 members) conducted a literature search spanning 2019-2024 using the keywords "Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition or GLIM." Prior GLIM guidance activities for using the criteria on muscle mass and inflammation were reviewed. Successive rounds of revision and review were used to achieve consensus.

Results: More than 400 scientific reports were published in peer-reviewed journals, forming the basis of 10 systematic reviews, some including meta-analyses of GLIM validity that indicate strong construct and predictive validity. Limitations and future priorities are discussed. Working group findings suggest that assessment of low muscle mass should be guided by experience and available technological resources. Clinical judgment may suffice to evaluate the inflammation/disease burden etiologic criterion. No revisions of the weight loss, low BMI, or reduced food intake/assimilation criteria are suggested. After two rounds of review and revision, the working group secured 100% agreement with the conclusions reported in the 5-year update.

Conclusion: Ongoing initiatives target priorities that include malnutrition risk screening procedures, GLIM adaptation to the intensive care setting, assessment in support of the reduced food intake/assimilation criterion, and determination of malnutrition in obesity.

Keywords: assessment; inflammation; malnutrition; muscle; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Tommy Cederholm disclosed receiving lecture honoraria from Fresenius‐Kabi, Nutricia/Danone, and Nestlé. M. Isabel T. D. Correia reported support from Abbott, Baxter, Danone, Fresenius, and Nestlé for lectures and educational materials. David C. Evans disclosed support from Abbott Nutrition for consulting and speaking honoraria, Fresenius Kabi for consulting and speaking honoraria, and Alcresta Therapeutics for consulting and speaking honoraria. M. Cristina Gonzalez disclosed receiving honoraria and/or paid consultancy from Abbott Nutrition, Nutricia, and Nestlé Health Science Brazil. Jeanette M. Hasse disclosed serving on the speakers bureau for Alcresta Therapeutics. Ainsley Malone disclosed that she is an employee of ASPEN. Kris M. Mogensen disclosed serving as an advisory board member for American Regent. Manpreet Mundi disclosed research grants from Nestlé and Northsea as well as service on the advisory boards of Baxter, NutriShare, and Otsuka. Alison Steiber reported that she is an employee of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and that she has received grant funding from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation and the Administration for Community Living. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GLIM diagnostic scheme for screening, diagnostic assessment and grading of malnutrition. First, identify subjects with risk factors for malnutrition. Second, apply the two etiologic criteria and the three phenotypic criteria. When at least one of each set of criteria is fulfilled, the diagnosis of malnutrition is confirmed. Third, determine severity, i.e., moderate or severe malnutrition based on the degree of aberration in the phenotypic criteria. This figure is adapted from the original 2019 consensus paper., ,

References

    1. Jensen GL, Mirtallo J, Compher C, et al. Adult starvation and disease‐related malnutrition: a proposal for etiology‐based diagnosis in the clinical practice setting from the International Consensus Guideline Committee. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34(2):156‐159. - PubMed
    1. Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Austin P, et al. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):49‐64. - PubMed
    1. Jensen GL, Cederholm T, Correia MITD, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition: a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019;43(1):32‐40. - PubMed
    1. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition: a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):1‐9. - PubMed
    1. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition—a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10:207‐217. - PMC - PubMed