Diversity and Functional Roles of Microorganisms in Anatolian Black Pine Cone Vinegar Fermentation
- PMID: 40223813
- PMCID: PMC11986371
- DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.70155
Diversity and Functional Roles of Microorganisms in Anatolian Black Pine Cone Vinegar Fermentation
Abstract
The parts of some pine species are a rich source of bioactive compounds that can be used in various food products. The current work, the physicochemical, bioactive, antimicrobial, sensory, and aromatic properties of traditional vinegar produced from Anatolian Black Pine Cones from different provinces of Turkey were determined, as well as the cultivable microbial diversity and metagenomic analysis. The total phenolic content of the vinegars ranged from 163.88 to 174.79 mg GAE/L. Antioxidant activity, measured via DPPH and ABTS assays, varied among the samples. CnB vinegar, made from Burdur province cones, stood out for its bioactive compounds, including terpenes, acetic acid, ascorbic acid, and the highest α-terpineol content (3.13%). CnB also exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity, with the largest inhibition zone (44.91 mm) against E. coli type A, while CnM showed the lowest activity. Sensory evaluations favored CnB for its balanced flavor, while CnV was criticized for excessive sharpness, and CnM was deemed too mild. The bacterial microbiome of CnB was predominantly composed of acetic acid bacteria, with an average concentration of 7.36 log CFU/mL in the enumeration of culturable microorganisms. The dominant bacterial taxa at the phyla level included Proteobacteria (72.296%), Firmicutes (22.062%), Bacteroidota (3.665%), followed by Acetobacteraceae (71.47%), Clostridia (13.187%), Bacilli (5.066%), Bacteroidetes (3.665%), and C. negativicutes (3.737%) at the phylum level. The fungal microbiome was mainly represented by Ascomycota (78.717%) and Eukaryota Incertae sedis (15.840%). The findings demonstrate that pine cone vinegar can be employed in a multitude of applications, including food preservation and health promotion.
Keywords: Anatolian black pine cone; antimicrobial activity; bioactive components; microbiota; vinegar.
© 2025 The Author(s). Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Adebayo‐Oyetoro, A. O. , Adenubi E., Ogundipe O. O., Bankole B. O., and Adeyeye S. A. O.. 2015. “Production and Quality Evaluation of Vinegar From Mango.” Cogent Food & Agriculture 3, no. 1: 1278193. 10.1080/23311932.2016.1278193. - DOI
-
- Al‐Dalali, S. , Zheng F., Sun B., Zhou C., Li M., and Chen F.. 2020. “Effects of Different Brewing Processes on the Volatile Flavor Profiles of Chinese Vinegar Determined by HS‐SPME‐AEDA With GC‐MS and GC‐O.” LWT 133: 109969. 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109969. - DOI
-
- Alhendawi, R. A. , Römheld V., Kirkby E. A., and Marschner H.. 1997. “Influence of Increasing Bicarbonate Concentrations on Plant Growth, Organic Acid Accumulation in Roots and Iron Uptake by Barley, Sorghum, and Maize.” Journal of Plant Nutrition 20, no. 12: 1731–1753. 10.1080/01904169709365371. - DOI
-
- Ayhan, B. , and Bilici S.. 2015. “Toplu Beslenme Sistemlerinde Kullanılan Gida Dezenfektanları.” Türk Hijyen Ve Deneysel Biyoloji 72, no. 4: 323–336. 10.5505/TurkHijyen.2015.82542. - DOI
-
- Bayram, M. , Kaya C., Yücel E. E., Er B., Gülmez E., and Terzioğlu E.. 2018. “Some Quality Characteristics of Rice Vinegar and Various Commercial Vinegars.” Akademik Gıda 16, no. 3: 293–300. 10.24323/akademik-gida.475357. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
