Association Between Nurse Staffing Coverage and Patient Outcomes in a Context of Prepandemic Structural Understaffing: A Patient-Unit-Level Analysis
- PMID: 40223888
- PMCID: PMC11985225
- DOI: 10.1155/jonm/8003569
Association Between Nurse Staffing Coverage and Patient Outcomes in a Context of Prepandemic Structural Understaffing: A Patient-Unit-Level Analysis
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between nurse staffing coverage and patient outcomes in a context of structural understaffing. Design: This is a population-based, cross-sectional, multicenter study, including patient and staffing data from eight public hospitals from Catalonia, Spain. Participants: A total of 183,085 adult in-patients admitted to hospital wards and step-down units during 2016 and 2017. Outcomes: In-hospital mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, and three cluster nurse-sensitive adverse events: healthcare-acquired infections, failure to maintain, and avoidable critical complications. The study factor is safe nursing staffing equivalent to nurse staffing coverage > 90%. Results: Average patient acuity was equivalent to 4.5 required nursing hours per patient day. The mean available nursing hours per patient day was 2.6. The average nurse staffing coverage reached 65.5%. Overall, 1.9% of patients died during hospitalization, 5% were readmitted within 30 days, and 15.9% experienced one or more adverse events. Statistically significant differences were identified for all patient outcomes when comparing patients safely covered (nurse staffing coverage > 90%) and under-covered (nurse staffing coverage < 90%). Increasing nurse staffing coverage to a safe level (> 90%) is associated with a reduction of the risk of death (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.37-0.45), a decrease in the risk of hospital readmission (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.97), and a reduction of nurse-sensitive adverse events (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.66-0.69). Conclusion: Safe nurse staffing coverage acts as a protective factor for detrimental patient outcomes, significantly reducing the risk of in-hospital mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, healthcare-associated infections, failure to maintain, and avoidable critical complications. Further policy efforts are needed to guarantee a safe registered nurse staffing coverage.
Copyright © 2025 Maria-Eulàlia Juvé-Udina et al. Journal of Nursing Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Acuity, nurse staffing and workforce, missed care and patient outcomes: A cluster-unit-level descriptive comparison.J Nurs Manag. 2020 Nov;28(8):2216-2229. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13040. Epub 2020 Jun 19. J Nurs Manag. 2020. PMID: 32384199 Free PMC article.
-
Nurse understaffing associated with adverse outcomes for surgical admissions.Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9):znae215. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae215. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 39313222 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of nursing policy on securing intensive care unit nurse staffing and in-hospital mortality.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Feb;86:103807. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103807. Epub 2024 Aug 30. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39216113
-
Nurse staffing levels and the incidence of mortality and morbidity in the adult intensive care unit: a literature review.Aust Crit Care. 2012 May;25(2):64-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 18. Aust Crit Care. 2012. PMID: 22515951 Review.
-
Nurse staffing and quality of patient care.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Mar;(151):1-115. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007. PMID: 17764206 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of nurse staffing coverage and care complexity factors on health outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study.BMC Nurs. 2025 May 13;24(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03142-5. BMC Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40361094 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources