Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb;54(2):285-296.

Clinical Application Effect of Postoperative Nursing Intervention on Patients Undergoing Transurethral Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Application Effect of Postoperative Nursing Intervention on Patients Undergoing Transurethral Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Baolian Guo. Iran J Public Health. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: To study the clinical effect of postoperative nursing on patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Methods: The relevant researches about nursing intervention effect evaluation after TURP during January 2000 to May 2024 were selected from databases. These were sorted into an intervention group (Int group) and a control group (Ctrl group) with different nursing methods. Theemotional status, length of hospital stays (LOHS), nursing satisfaction, the incidence, volume, and frequency of urinary incontinence (UI), and the incidences of urinary hemorrhage (UH), bladder spasm (BS), and catheter occlusion (CO) were compared after intervention.

Results: Eleven articles and 1,020 cases were included. The LOHS in the Int group was much shorter (mean difference (MD)=-2.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.47~-1.35, Z=3.66, P=0.0002). The nursing satisfaction was significantly improved (odds ratio (OR)=5.70, 95% CI: 3.65-8.90, Z=7.64, P<0.00001). For complications, incidence of UI (OR=0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.66, Z=3.72, P=0.0002), the volume of UI (MD=-66.17, 95% CI: -124.74~-11.60, Z=2.36, P=0.02), and the frequency of UI (MD=-1.18, 95% CI: -1.69~-0.67, Z=4.55, P<0.00001) greatly reduced. The incidences of UH (OR=0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.87, Z=2.35, P=0.02), BS (OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.14-0.42, Z=4.97, P<0.00001), and CO (OR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.11-0.36, Z=5.21, P<0.00001) were also highly reduced.

Conclusion: Postoperative nursing intervention could effectively shorten LOHS after TURP in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), improving the nursing satisfaction and reducing the incidence of postoperative complications.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Nursing intervention; Postoperative; Transurethral resection of the prostate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Basic flow of literature retrieval
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:
Risk of bias assessment
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3:
Postoperative LOHS of patients undergoing TURP

Similar articles

References

    1. Plochocki A, King B. (2022). Medical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am, 49(2):231–238. - PubMed
    1. Infante Hernández S, Gómez Rivas J, Moreno Sierra J. (2024). Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Hiperplasia benigna de próstata. Med Clin (Barc), 163(8):407–414. - PubMed
    1. Miernik A, Gratzke C. (2020). Current Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 117(49):843–854. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foo KT. (2019). What is a disease? What is the disease clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). World J Urol, 37(7):1293–1296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cicero AFG, Allkanjari O, Busetto GM, et al. (2019). Nutraceutical treatment and prevention of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 91(3): 10.4081/aiua.2019.3.139. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources