Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 17;10(3):753-761.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.12.012. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Obinutuzumab and Ofatumumab are More Effective Than Rituximab in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy Patients With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies

Affiliations

Obinutuzumab and Ofatumumab are More Effective Than Rituximab in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy Patients With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies

Maxime Teisseyre et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: Although rituximab has significantly improved outcomes for patients with membranous nephropathy, response to treatment is not universal and drug resistance can occur. One mechanism of resistance is the occurrence of antidrug antibodies. Obinutuzumab and ofatumumab are humanized and human monoclonal antibodies, respectively, that target B cells. These treatments have been shown to be effective in membranous nephropathy. However, obinutuzumab and ofatumumab have never been compared with rituximab in the treatment of patients with membranous nephropathy with anti-rituximab antibodies. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab and ofatumumab with rituximab in patients with membranous nephropathy with anti-rituximab antibodies.

Methods: This international retrospective multicenter study enrolled 34 patients with membranous nephropathy from 5 nephrology departments in France, India, and Italy. All the patients had previously developed anti-rituximab antibodies. Nineteen patients received rituximab, 12 received obinutuzumab, and 3 received ofatumumab.

Results: Patients treated with obinutuzumab or ofatumumab were more likely to achieve clinical remission than those treated with rituximab at month 6 (87% vs. 37%, P = 0.005) and month 12 (87% vs. 42%, P = 0.01). Patients treated with obinutuzumab or ofatumumab were more likely to achieve immunological remission and B-cell depletion at month 6 than the patients treated with rituximab (92% vs. 56%, P = 0.04 and 93% vs. 35%, P = 0.002, respectively). No serious adverse events were reported in the obinutuzumab or ofatumumab group.

Conclusion: Obinutuzumab and ofatumumab are more effective than rituximab in treating patients with membranous nephropathy with anti-rituximab antibodies. Anti-rituximab antibodies should be systematically monitored, to determine appropriate treatment.

Keywords: antidrug antibodies; immunomonitoring; membranous nephropathy; obinutuzumab; ofatumumab; rituximab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Time to clinical remission. Kaplan–Meier estimate of clinical remission (complete or partial) in the obinutuzumab or ofatumumab group versus rituximab group. OBI/OFA, obinutuzumab or ofatumumab group; RTX, rituximab group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
B-cell cytotoxicity assay. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (1.8 × 106) from healthy donors were preincubated with 20 μl of serum from 2 patients with anti-rituximab antibodies diluted 1:2 (ADA) or PBS as a control, then incubated overnight at 37 °C with rituximab 50 ng/ml, obinutuzumab 50 ng/ml, or PBS as a negative control. The percentage of B cells (CD19+) was determined by flow cytometry. The different conditions were expressed as percentage of B cells (i.e., viability) compared with the control condition (without patient serum or anti-CD20 antibody). ADA, serum with antidrug antibodies; OBI, obinutuzumab; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; RTX, rituximab.

References

    1. Beck L.H., Bonegio R.G.B., Lambeau G., et al. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:11–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810457. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Remuzzi G., Chiurchiu C., Abbate M., Brusegan V., Bontempelli M., Ruggenenti P. Rituximab for idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Lancet. 2002;360:923–924. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11042-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fervenza F.C., Cosio F.G., Erickson S.B., et al. Rituximab treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2008;73:117–125. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002628. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fervenza F.C., Abraham R.S., Erickson S.B., et al. Rituximab therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a 2-year study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:2188–2198. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05080610. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fervenza F.C., Appel G.B., Barbour S.J., et al. Rituximab or cyclosporine in the treatment of membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:36–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814427. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources