Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robotic Intraoperative Adverse Events in Benign Gynecological Procedures and the Correlation of the Adverse Events With Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Analysis
- PMID: 40225462
- PMCID: PMC11992468
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.80497
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robotic Intraoperative Adverse Events in Benign Gynecological Procedures and the Correlation of the Adverse Events With Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Analysis
Abstract
Introduction Intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) are a part of any gynecological surgery, including laparoscopy and robotic surgery. Robotic surgery, with advanced three-dimensional vision, is supposed to have fewer complications than laparoscopy. We aim to compare iAEs between laparoscopic (LA) and robotic (RA) procedures and correlate them with postoperative complications and risk factor analysis. Methods A prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care center between July and October 2023 with 80 cases (myomectomy, hysterectomy, and endometriosis resection). Intraoperative (as per ClassIntra classification) and postoperative (as per Clavien-Dindo classification) complications were recorded, and data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Categorical variables were summarized as n (%), while quantitative variables were summarized by mean ±S.D. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done for risk analysis (adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval). Results Overall, we reported 3.75% (3/80) iAEs (all in LA) and 32.5% (26/80) postoperative complications. Increased postoperative complications were seen in LA 15/40 (37.5%) than in RA 11/40 (27.5%). However, the difference was statistically insignificant (p =0.12 and p =0.47). Cases with higher iAE grades consecutively experienced higher postoperative complications (p 0.0001). The independent clinical risk factors, ASA score II status (aOR: 2.335, 95%CI: 0.707-7.709), increasing uterine size (aOR: 1.076, 95%CI: 0.953-1.214), endometriosis (aOR: 2.337, 95%CI: 0.615-8.878), previous surgical history (aOR: 1.595, 95%CI: 0.544-4.677), and lower preoperative hemoglobin (aOR: 0.721, 95%CI: 0.502-1.036), affecting postoperative complications were analyzed. However, none of the factors had a statistically significant association with postoperative complications. Conclusions We observed lesser complication rates in robotic surgery than in conventional laparoscopy. We also found that those with higher iAE grades were strongly associated with higher postoperative complication grades.
Keywords: complications; intraoperative; laparoscopy; postoperative; robotic.
Copyright © 2025, Sinha et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee -Biomedical Research Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad issued approval AHJ-ACD-012/05-23, dated 28-07-2023. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Similar articles
-
[Prospective Cohort Study of In-Hospital Patients Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery for the Validation of ClassIntra: Classification of Intraoperative Adverse Events].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2021 Apr;238(4):510-520. doi: 10.1055/a-1440-1034. Epub 2021 Apr 30. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2021. PMID: 33930927 German.
-
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30222939
-
[Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;55(2):112-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.02.010. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32146740 Chinese.
-
Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 15;4(4):CD011422. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011422.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30985921 Free PMC article.
-
In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 6;5(5):CD013352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013352.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32374421 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 19;19(1):497. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02676-9. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40830484 Free PMC article.
-
Innovative classification system for enlarged uterus in laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy with complications and pain scores.J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 28;19(1):183. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02369-3. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40295457
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources