Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2044-2056.
doi: 10.62347/BGRM4102. eCollection 2025.

Effect of tirofiban arterial injection on neurological and endothelial function in acute ischemic stroke patients beyond the thrombolysis time window

Affiliations

Effect of tirofiban arterial injection on neurological and endothelial function in acute ischemic stroke patients beyond the thrombolysis time window

Yao Xue et al. Am J Transl Res. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of arterial tirofiban injection in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) beyond the thrombolysis time window.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, clinical data were analyzed from 230 AIS patients treated at the First Hospital of Yulin between July 2021 and January 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the observation group (n=102) treated with tirofiban combined with dual antiplatelet therapy, and the control group (n=128) that received dual antiplatelet therapy alone. Post-treatment follow-up evaluated neurological function, endothelial function, and safety using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Barthel Index (BI). Endothelial function was assessed by measuring levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1), nitric oxide (NO), and von Willebrand factor (vWF). Baseline characteristics, treatment protocols, and complications were analyzed to ensure the reliability and scientific rigor of the results.

Results: Compared to the control group, the observation group demonstrated significant improvements in NIHSS, mRS, and BI scores, indicating enhanced neurological function and self-care ability. Endothelial markers (ET-1, NO, and vWF) also significantly improved in the observation group, suggesting a beneficial effect on endothelial function. The overall efficacy rate at 90 days was 86.72% in the observation group, significantly higher than the 74.50% in the control group (P<0.05). In terms of safety, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups, indicating that tirofiban is well-tolerated. Multivariate analysis identified age, treatment protocol, and baseline NO levels as independent factors affecting the 90-day prognosis, underscoring the importance of individualized treatment strategies for AIS patients.

Conclusion: Arterial injection of tirofiban significantly improves neurological and endothelial function in AIS patients beyond the thrombolysis time window while maintaining a favorable safety profile. These findings support the use of tirofiban in patients who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment.

Keywords: Tirofiban; acute ischemic stroke; endothelial function; neurological function; safety; thrombolysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multivariate logistic analysis of factors affecting 90-day prognosis in patients. Note: NO, Nitric Oxide; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves of significant risk factors in predicting 90-day prognosis in patients. A: Treatment Plan (AUC=0.685, 95% CI: 0.579-0.736, Cut-off =0.730, Sensitivity =0.700, Specificity =0.611); B: Age (AUC=0.851, 95% CI: 0.759-0.905, Cut-off =68.5, Sensitivity =0.789, Specificity =0.874); C: Hypertension (AUC=0.603, 95% CI: 0.553-0.695, Cut-off =0.690, Sensitivity =0.750, Specificity =0.489); D: NIHSS before treatment (AUC=0.641, 95% CI: 0.607-0.705, Cut-off =6.00, Sensitivity =0.743, Specificity =0.711); E: NO1 before treatment (AUC=0.672, 95% CI: 0.569-0.764, Cut-off =44.6, Sensitivity =0.765, Specificity =0.537). Note: NO, Nitric Oxide; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Similar articles

References

    1. Walter K. What is acute ischemic stroke? JAMA. 2022;327:885. - PubMed
    1. Ma Q, Li R, Wang L, Yin P, Wang Y, Yan C, Ren Y, Qian Z, Vaughn MG, McMillin SE, Hay SI, Naghavi M, Cai M, Wang C, Zhang Z, Zhou M, Lin H, Yang Y. Temporal trend and attributable risk factors of stroke burden in China, 1990-2019: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6:e897–e906. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huo X, Ma G, Tong X, Zhang X, Pan Y, Nguyen TN, Yuan G, Han H, Chen W, Wei M, Zhang J, Zhou Z, Yao X, Wang G, Song W, Cai X, Nan G, Li D, Wang AY, Ling W, Cai C, Wen C, Wang E, Zhang L, Jiang C, Liu Y, Liao G, Chen X, Li T, Liu S, Li J, Gao F, Ma N, Mo D, Song L, Sun X, Li X, Deng Y, Luo G, Lv M, He H, Liu A, Zhang J, Mu S, Liu L, Jing J, Nie X, Ding Z, Du W, Zhao X, Yang P, Liu L, Wang Y, Liebeskind DS, Pereira VM, Ren Z, Wang Y, Miao Z ANGEL-ASPECT Investigators. Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1272–1283. - PubMed
    1. Li S, Gu HQ, Li H, Wang X, Jin A, Guo S, Lu G, Che F, Wang W, Wei Y, Wang Y, Li Z, Meng X, Zhao X, Liu L, Wang Y RAISE Investigators. Reteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:2264–2273. - PubMed
    1. Meng X, Li S, Dai H, Lu G, Wang W, Che F, Geng Y, Sun M, Li X, Li H, Wang Y. Tenecteplase vs alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke: the original randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;332:1437–1445. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources