Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Apr 8:19:2737-2747.
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S505079. eCollection 2025.

Establishing the Median and 95% Effective Doses of Oliceridine for Immediate Post-Surgical Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blind, Sequential Dose-Finding Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Establishing the Median and 95% Effective Doses of Oliceridine for Immediate Post-Surgical Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blind, Sequential Dose-Finding Study

Xianghua Cao et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. .

Abstract

Background: This investigation aimed to establish the optimal dosing parameters of oliceridine for postoperative pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) procedures. Using Dixon and Massey's up-and-down sequential allocation method, the median effective dose (ED50) and the dose required for 95% effective dose (ED95) were determined, alongside an evaluation of the agent's safety profile.

Methods: In this prospective trial, 82 participants scheduled for LC were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either oliceridine or saline (control). Prior to surgical incision, the intervention group received varying doses of intravenous oliceridine, while control subjects received equivalent volumes of saline solution. Post-surgical pain management involved standardized multimodal analgesic protocols for both cohorts. Baseline demographic data was documented for all participants. Pain evaluations using the 11-point verbal numeric rating scale (NRS) at 15 min, 30 min, and 2h post-extubation. Using Dixon's up-and-down methodology, the ED50 and ED95 were determined. Hemodynamic variables were tracked and pain levels quantified throughout the procedure. The study protocol included monitoring post-anesthetic recovery characteristics and documenting adverse effects.

Results: Probability unit regression analysis indicated that the ED50 of oliceridine for the prevention of early postoperative pain was calculated to be 18.45 µg/kg (95% CI: 16.85-19.82 µg/kg), while the ED95 was determined to be 22.39 µg/kg (95% CI: 20.75-26.98 µg/kg). Statistical analysis showed comparable rates of adverse events between study groups (p > 0.05). Additional analyses demonstrated similar outcomes between oliceridine and control cohorts regarding hemodynamic stability, and adverse effect profiles. Pain management satisfaction assessment at 24 hours post-LC revealed high approval rates in the oliceridine group, with 90% of patients (36/40, p=0.31) and 97.5% of surgeons (39/40, p=0.03) expressing satisfaction, regardless of administered dose.

Conclusion: Our findings establish that for early postoperative pain management, oliceridine demonstrates optimal therapeutic efficacy at an ED50 of 18.45 ug/kg, with the ED95 determined to be 22.39 ug/kg.

Keywords: ED50; ED95; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; oliceridine; postoperative pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The consort flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dixon and Massey up-and-down plot line chart. The sequence of patients receiving oliceridine. The quality of analgesia was measured using NRS (from 0 to 10) and was defined as ineffective (NRS score ≥ 3) or effective (NRS score<3).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose-response curve of oliceridine for preventing early postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at different time points during surgery. Data are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range). T0: BL, baseline; pre-operation. T1: at the time of skin incision. T2: the gallbladder dissection off the liver bed by the electric knife. White box: The control group; Gray box: The oliceridine group.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aloraini A, Alanezi T, AlShahwan N. Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open total cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Prob Surg. 2024;61(11):101607. doi:10.1016/j.cpsurg.2024.101607 - DOI - PubMed
    1. on behalf of the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force, Pucher PH, Brunt LM, Davies N, et al. Outcome trends and safety measures after 30 years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and pooled data analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(5):2175–2183. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5974-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hilvering B, Draaisma WA, Van Der Bilt JDW, Valk RM, Kofman KE, Consten ECJ. Randomized clinical trial of combined preincisional infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2011;98(6):784–789. doi:10.1002/bjs.7435 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J British Surg. 2000;87(3):273–284. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01374.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitra S, Khandelwal P, Roberts K, Kumar S, Vadivelu N. Pain relief in laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a review of the current options. Pain Pract. 2012;12(6):485–496. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00513.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources