Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Nov 18:2024:9294268.
doi: 10.1155/2024/9294268. eCollection 2024.

A Longitudinal Correlational Study of Psychological Resilience, Depression Disorder, and Brain Functional-Structural Hybrid Connectome in Breast Cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Longitudinal Correlational Study of Psychological Resilience, Depression Disorder, and Brain Functional-Structural Hybrid Connectome in Breast Cancer

Mu Zi Liang et al. Depress Anxiety. .

Abstract

Purposes: To evaluate the association between psychological resilience, depression disorder (DD), and brain functional-structural hybrid connectome in patients with breast cancer before treatment (T0) and at 1 year. Methods: Between February 2017 and October 2019, 172 patients were longitudinally enrolled from a multicenter trial named as Be Resilient to Breast Cancer (BRBC) and completed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) before the T0. Data-driven multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA) and correlational tractography (CT) were performed to identify distinct functional-structural hybrid connectome. DD was diagnosed by psychiatry physicians according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Psychological resilience was collected by Resilience Scale Specific to Cancer (RS-SC) and tested as the mediation variable between hybrid connectome and DD. Results: Of the total sample of 172, 14.5% (N = 25) were diagnosed with DD. High psychological resilience was associated with a lower risk of DD (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.82, p=0.0368). Frontal pole right (88.0%) in rs-fMRI and arcuate fasciculus_L (75.2%) in DTI were identified as main significant brain areas. Psychological resilience accounted for 10.01%-12.14% of direct effect between brain functional-structural hybrid connectome and 1-year DD. Conclusion: Psychological resilience predicts DD at 1 year and mediates the association between brain functional-structural hybrid connectome and DD at 1 year in patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03026374.

Keywords: Be Resilient to Breast Cancer; brain functional–structural hybrid connectome; breast cancer; depression disorder; psychological resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Timeline for the enrollment in the BRBC. (B) rs-fMRI and DTI scanning parameters in different centers. (C) Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for patients. BRBC, Be Resilient to Breast Cancer; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; rs-fMRI, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) PCA for RI. (B) The Kaplan–Meier analysis between psychological resilience group membership (high versus low) and 1-year DD. DD, depression disorder; PCA, principal component analysis; RI, resilience index.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Significant brain regions and voxels in MVPA. (B) Seed-to-voxel associations in the high/low resilience groups. (C) ROI to ROI associations in the high/low resilience groups. MVPA, multivoxel pattern analysis; ROI, region of interest.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Reconstruction for the fibers across the whole brain. (B) Super-resolution white matter imaging for all patients. (C) Significant neural pathways in CT. (D) ROI to ROI associations in the high/low resilience groups. CT, correlational tractography; ROI, region of interest.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) The mediation analysis between brain functional–structural hybrid connectome and 1-year. (B) AUC, NRI, and IDI for Model 1 (CM) versus Model 2 (CM + connectomics). (C) Calibration curves for Model 1 (CM) versus Model 2 (CM + connectomics). (D) Decision curve analysis for Model 1 (CM) versus Model 2 (CM + connectomics). (E) Clinical impact curve for Model 2 (CM + connectomics). AUC, area under curve; CM, conventional model; DD, depression disorder; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; NRI, net reclassification improvement.

References

    1. Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2024;74(3):229–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allemani C., Matsuda T., Di Carlo V., et al. Global Surveillance of Trends in Cancer Survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): Analysis of Individual Records for 37 513 025 Patients Diagnosed With One of 18 Cancers From 322 Population-Based Registries in 71 Countries. Lancet . 2018;391(10125):1023–1075. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartung T. J., Brähler E., Faller H., et al. The Risk of Being Depressed Is Significantly Higher in Cancer Patients Than in the General Population: Prevalence and Severity of Depressive Symptoms Across Major Cancer Types. European Journal of Cancer . 2017;72:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.11.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carvalho A. F., Hyphantis T., Sales P. M., et al. Major Depressive Disorder in Breast Cancer: A Critical Systematic Review of Pharmacological and Psychotherapeutic Clinical Trials. Cancer Treatment Reviews . 2014;40(3):349–355. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.09.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen B. L., DeRubeis R. J., Berman B. S., et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Screening, Assessment, and Care of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adults with Cancer: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Adaptation. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2014;32(15):1605–1619. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4611. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data