Delayed vs Immediate Coloanal Anastomosis after Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 40226931
- DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001410
Delayed vs Immediate Coloanal Anastomosis after Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Despite increasing interest in Turnbull-Cutait pull-through delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) for low rectal cancer, its advantages over conventional immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICAA) with a diverting stoma remain unclear. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between DCAA and ICAA after elective total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer.
Study design: This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent elective minimally invasive total mesorectal excision with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (ICAA or DCAA) for primary low rectal adenocarcinoma. The primary outcome was the overall 30-day postoperative complication rate. Postoperative anorectal function was assessed using the low anterior resection syndrome and Wexner scores 1 and 2 years postoperatively.
Results: A total of 305 consecutive patients (109 delayed and 196 immediate) were assessed. The overall 30-day postoperative complication rate was 25%, with a significantly lower incidence in the DCAA group compared with the ICAA group (15% vs 31%, p = 0.002). Both early (within 30 days) and late (after 30 days) anastomosis-related complications were significantly lower in the DCAA group than that in the ICAA group, at 7% vs 15%, p = 0.047, and 2% vs 11%, p = 0.005, respectively. Two years postoperatively, the DCAA cohort had a significantly lower proportion of patients with major low anterior resection syndrome (38% vs 60%, p = 0.018) and severe incontinence (0% vs 8%, p = 0.029).
Conclusions: DCAA without a diverting stoma for low rectal cancer removes the risks associated with stoma creation and closure-related morbidity. DCAA is also linked to significantly lower postoperative morbidity and improved anorectal function at 2 years compared with ICAA with a diverting stoma. DCAA may therefore be the optimal anastomotic method for patients with low rectal cancer.
Copyright © 2025 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Marijnen CA, Kapiteijn E, van de Velde CJ, et al. Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:817–825.
-
- Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, et al. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2007;246:207–214.
-
- Evrard S, Bellera C, Desolneux G, et al. Anastomotic leakage and functional outcomes following total mesorectal excision with delayed and immediate colo-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: two single-arm phase II trials. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023;49:107015.
-
- Yang J, Luo Y, Tian T, et al. Effects of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on postoperative complications in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Oncol 2022;2022:8197701.
-
- Phan K, Oh L, Ctercteko G, et al. Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019;10:179–187.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources