Biomarkers and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma: Unveiling New Horizons for Precision Therapy
- PMID: 40227772
- PMCID: PMC11987923
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers17071243
Biomarkers and Management of Cholangiocarcinoma: Unveiling New Horizons for Precision Therapy
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy with limited methods for early detection, necessitating the development of reliable biomarkers for diagnosis and management. However, conventional tumor markers, such as CA19-9 and CEA, exhibit insufficient diagnostic accuracy. Recent advancements in molecular genetics have identified several actionable mutations in CCA, enabling molecularly targeted therapies that improve survival in patients harboring these genetic alterations. Cancer panels, which facilitate multiplex genetic profiling, are critical for identifying these mutations. Studies indicate that several actionable mutations are detected in CCA cases, with patients receiving mutation-guided therapies achieving markedly better outcomes. Liquid biopsies, including cell-free DNA and circulating tumor DNA, offer real-time, non-invasive approaches to monitoring tumor dynamics, heterogeneity, and treatment responses. Furthermore, numerous studies have identified non-coding RNAs in serum and bile as promising biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of CCA. On the other hand, immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has shown efficacy in subsets of CCA patients. However, the success of these therapies is often affected by the status of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME), underscoring the need for comprehensive TME analysis to predict responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Despite these advances, no single biomarker currently demonstrates sufficient sensitivity or specificity for clinical application. The integration of multi-omics approaches with cutting-edge technologies holds promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing treatment stratification, and advancing precision medicine in CCA. These developments highlight the transformative potential of biomarkers to improve early detection, prognostic assessment, and personalized therapeutic interventions for CCA.
Keywords: cholangiocarcinoma; liquid biopsy; mutations; non-coding RNAs; tumor immune microenvironment.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
KRAS Mutations in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prevalence, Prognostic Value, and KRAS G12/G13 Detection in Cell-Free DNA.Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2025 Jan-Feb;22(1):112-126. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20492. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2025. PMID: 39730186 Free PMC article.
-
Liquid biopsy-based protein biomarkers for risk prediction, early diagnosis, and prognostication of cholangiocarcinoma.J Hepatol. 2023 Jul;79(1):93-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Mar 1. J Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 36868481 Free PMC article.
-
Cholangiocarcinoma: Recent Advances in Molecular Pathobiology and Therapeutic Approaches.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 16;16(4):801. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040801. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38398194 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immunotherapy of cholangiocarcinoma: Therapeutic strategies and predictive biomarkers.Cancer Lett. 2022 Oct 10;546:215853. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215853. Epub 2022 Jul 31. Cancer Lett. 2022. PMID: 35921970 Review.
-
Practical considerations in screening for genetic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma.Ann Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1111-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 28. Ann Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33932504 Review.
References
-
- Knox J.J., McNamara M.G., Bazin I.S., Oh D.Y., Zubkov O., Breder V., Bai L.Y., Christie A., Goyal L., Cosgrove D.P., et al. A phase III randomised study of first-line NUC-1031/cisplatin vs. gemcitabine/cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer. J. Hepatol. 2025. in press . - PubMed
-
- Shroff R.T., King G., Colby S., Scott A.J., Borad M.J., Goff L., Matin K., Mahipal A., Kalyan A., Javle M.M., et al. SWOG S1815: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 2025;43:536–544. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vogel A., Saborowski A., Wenzel P., Wege H., Folprecht G., Kretzschmar A., Schutt P., Jacobasch L., Ziegenhagen N., Boeck S., et al. Nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapies (AIO NALIRICC): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2024;9:734–744. - PubMed
-
- Takahara N., Nakai Y., Isayama H., Sasaki T., Morine Y., Watanabe K., Ueno M., Ioka T., Kanai M., Kondo S., et al. A prospective multicenter phase II study of FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced and recurrent biliary tract cancer. Investig. New Drugs. 2023;41:76–85. doi: 10.1007/s10637-022-01322-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lamarca A., Palmer D.H., Wasan H.S., Ross P.J., Ma Y.T., Arora A., Falk S., Gillmore R., Wadsley J., Patel K., et al. Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy versus active symptom control for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC-06): A phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:690–701. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources