Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 6;17(7):1242.
doi: 10.3390/cancers17071242.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for the Management of Fibrotic Non-Lifting Colorectal Lesions (NLCLs): Results from a Large Multicenter Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) for the Management of Fibrotic Non-Lifting Colorectal Lesions (NLCLs): Results from a Large Multicenter Retrospective Study

Giuseppe Dell'Anna et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The management of non-lifting colorectal lesions (NLCLs), often resulting from previous unsuccessful treatments or biopsies, remains challenging due to submucosal fibrosis that prevents adequate lifting. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a viable option for achieving complete resection in such cases. However, when standard ESD is not feasible, conversion to hybrid ESD (H-ESD) has been proposed as a rescue strategy. This study aimed to assess ESD's feasibility, effectiveness, and safety for NLCLs, including cases requiring conversion to H-ESD, when performed by experienced endoscopists in tertiary referral centers. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, data from patients with NLCLs treated by ESD/H-ESD between January 2009 and September 2022 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the recurrence rate (RR). Secondary endpoints included the adverse event (AE) rate, technical success (TS) rate (en bloc resection regardless of technique), complete resection (CR), curative resection (cR) rates, and surgical intervention rate. Predictors of ESD technical success were identified. Results: In total, 178 patients with NLCLs were included (52 previously biopsied, 126 recurrent after previous resection). ESD was used in 111 (62.4%) and H-ESD in 67 (37.6%) cases. During a median follow-up of 373 days (IQR 540), the overall RR was 3.6%. The overall AE rate was 13.4%, and perforation was the most frequent (8.4%). All AEs were successfully managed endoscopically. The TS rate was 71.9%, significantly higher in previously biopsied lesions compared to recurrent ones (78.8% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, rectal location (p < 0.001), F1 fibrosis (p = 0.026), and previously biopsied lesions (p = 0.006) predicted ESD TS without the need for conversion to H-ESD. Conclusions: ESD/H-ESD is feasible and safe for NLCLs when performed by experienced operators, with low RR amenable to endoscopic treatment. Previously biopsied lesions, rectal location, and low fibrosis predict ESD TS.

Keywords: EMR; ESD; NLCL; colorectal; hybrid; no-lifting; polyps; recurrent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.D. has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Schering-Plough, AbbVie, Actelion, Alphawasserman, AstraZeneca, Cellerix, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Ferring, Genentech, Grunenthal, Johnson and Johnson, Millenium Takeda, MSD, Nikkiso Europe GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Nycomed, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, UCB Pharma, and Vifor. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Endoscopic images showing (A) recurrent non-lifting colorectal lesion (NLCL) of the sigmoid colon; (B) fibrosis during endoscopic submucosal dissection; and the (C) post-resection site. The copyright of the image belongs to the authors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Endoscopic images showing (A) recurrent non-lifting colorectal lesion (NLCL) of the distal rectum; (B) fibrosis during endoscopic submucosal dissection; (C) conversion to hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection; and the (D) post-resection site. The copyright of the image belongs to the authors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study flow diagram according to the STROBE statement. ESD = endoscopic submucosal dissection; NLCL = non-lifting colorectal lesion; H-ESD = hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection; SC = surveillance colonoscopy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Trend of the predicted probability of conversion to hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD) over time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ishiguro A., Uno Y., Ishiguro Y., Munakata A., Morita T. Correlation of Lifting versus Non-Lifting and Microscopic Depth of Invasion in Early Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1999;50:329–333. doi: 10.1053/ge.1999.v50.98591. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi N., Saito Y., Sano Y., Uragami N., Michita T., Nasu J., Matsuda T., Fu K., Fujii T., Fujimori T., et al. Determining the Treatment Strategy for Colorectal Neoplastic Lesions: Endoscopic Assessment or the Non-Lifting Sign for Diagnosing Invasion Depth? Endoscopy. 2007;39:701–705. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966587. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiba H., Tachikawa J., Arimoto J., Ashikari K., Kuwabara H., Nakaoka M., Goto T., Ohata K., Nakajima A. Predictive Factors of Mild and Severe Fibrosis in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020;65:232–242. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05735-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cecinato P., Lisotti A., Azzolini F., Lucarini M., Bassi F., Fusaroli P., Sassatelli R. Left Colonic Localization, Non-Granular Morphology, and Pit Pattern Independently Predict Submucosal Fibrosis of Naïve Colorectal Neoplasms before Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Surg. Endosc. 2023;37:3037–3045. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09828-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sferrazza S., Maida M., Calabrese G., Facciorusso A., Fuccio L., Frazzoni L., Maselli R., Repici A., Di Mitri R., Santos-Antunes J. The Derivation and External Validation of a Fibrosis Risk Model for Colorectal Tumours Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13:4517. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154517. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources