Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 14:21925682251334122.
doi: 10.1177/21925682251334122. Online ahead of print.

Staged Versus Same-Day Circumferential Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: Which is the Safer Approach?

Henry Avetisian  1 , Mirbahador Athari  1 , William Karakash  1 , Jordan O Gasho  1 , Matthew C Gallo  1 , Jeffrey C Wang  1 , Raymond J Hah  1 , Ram K Alluri  1
Affiliations

Staged Versus Same-Day Circumferential Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: Which is the Safer Approach?

Henry Avetisian et al. Global Spine J. .

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate utilization trends and outcomes of same-day vs staged circumferential lumbar fusion (cLF) in lumbar degenerative disease.MethodsThe PearlDiver national database was queried for patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent same-day or staged cLF, defined as anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by posterior fusion within 1 to 14 days after. Annual utilization trends (2010-2021) were analyzed. Multivariate regression adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity index, obesity, smoking, and multi-level PSF was used to evaluate 30-day complications, readmissions, and revision rates at 1 and 2 years.ResultsOf 45,204 patients undergoing cLF, 40,052 (88.60%) underwent same-day cLF, and 5152 (11.40%) underwent staged procedures. Patients who underwent staged procedures had higher comorbidity rates and longer fusion constructs. Annual utilization of staged cLF increased on average by 3.76% from 2010. Staged procedures had higher risks of 30-day readmissions (aOR: 1.14), infection (aOR: 1.38), DVT (aOR: 2.62), epidural hematoma (aOR: 1.73), seroma (aOR:1.77), AKI (aOR: 1.34), cardiac arrest (aOR: 2.45), blood loss anemia (aOR: 1.56), urinary retention (aOR: 1.50), UTI (aOR: 1.36), ileus (aOR: 1.64), durotomy (aOR: 4.67), mechanical complications (aOR: 3.39), and blood transfusions (aOR: 2.57) (all P < 0.05). No significant differences in revision rates were found.ConclusionStaged cLF, utilized in 11.40% of cases, particularly for longer fusions and patients with higher comorbidity risk, is associated with higher risks of hospital readmissions and complications, but is not an independent risk factor. Further research is needed to identify patients who may benefit most from staging.

Keywords: circumferential; complications; degenerative; fusion; lumbar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Henry Avetisian, Mirbahador Athari, William Karakash, Jordan O. Gasho, and Matthew C. Gallo have nothing to disclose. Jeffrey C. Wang has received intellectual property royalties from Zimmer Biomet, NovApproach, SeaSpine, and DePuy Synthes. Raymond J. Hah has received grant funding from SI bone, consulting fees from NuVasive, and support from the North American Spine Society to attend meetings. Ram K. Alluri has received grant funding from NIH, consulting fees from HIA Technologies, and payment from Eccential Robotics for lectures and presentations.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Annual utilization trends of staged cLF.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1(1):2-18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwon BK, Hilibrand AS, Malloy K, et al. A critical analysis of the literature regarding surgical approach and outcome for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(Suppl):S30-40. - PubMed
    1. Swan J, Hurwitz E, Malek F, et al. Surgical treatment for unstable low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fusion compared with combined anterior-posterior fusion. Spine J. 2006;6(6):606-614. - PubMed
    1. Tye EY, Tanenbaum JE, Alonso AS, et al. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2018;18(3):464-471. - PubMed
    1. Albayar A, Santangelo G, Spadola M, et al. Comparison of staged vs same-day circumferential spinal fusions for adult spinal deformity. Internet J Spine Surg. 2023;17(6):843-855. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources