Use of an abdominal binder in colonoscopies performed by trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
- PMID: 40229596
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11710-8
Use of an abdominal binder in colonoscopies performed by trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Colonoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic tool for colonic diseases and serves as the preferred screening method for colorectal cancer (CRC). A common difficulty during colonoscopy is the looping of the colon, which can result in patient discomfort, prolonged cecal intubation time (CIT), and the need for auxiliary maneuvers. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using an abdominal binder during colonoscopy performed by trainees.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary center. Participants were outpatients aged 20-80 years undergoing elective colonoscopy. They were randomly assigned to either the abdominal binder (AB) group or the sham binder (SB) group. The primary outcome measured was cecal intubation time. Secondary outcomes included the need for manual abdominal compression and postural adjustments during the procedure.
Results: A total of 211 participants were enrolled in the study. The median CIT was significantly shorter in the AB group compared to the SB group (728 s vs. 774 s, p = 0.008). Additionally, the AB group demonstrated a significantly reduced need for manual abdominal compression (p ≤ 0.001) and postural adjustments (p = 0.01). The requirement for abdominal compression decreased by 40% (95% CI 27.7-52.9%), while the need for postural changes was reduced by 9.4% (95% CI 1.9-88.7%).
Conclusion: The use of an abdominal binder during colonoscopy performed by trainees significantly reduced cecal intubation time and minimized the need for ancillary maneuvers, such as manual abdominal compression and postural adjustments.
Keywords: Abdominal binder; Cecal intubation time; Colonoscopy; Trainees.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Disclosures: Antonio Marmolejo, Sinue Cázarez, Carlos J. Mata, Sergio Ayala, Jorge Farell, Nubia A. Ramírez, Carlos A. Navarro, and Luis García have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Similar articles
-
The effectiveness of using an abdominal binder during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug;56(8):990-997. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1941238. Epub 2021 Jun 21. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34154490 Clinical Trial.
-
Use of an Abdominal Compression Device in Colonoscopy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jun;14(6):850-857.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.039. Epub 2016 Jan 6. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 26767313 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Novel Hands-Free Abdominal Compression Device for Colonoscopy Significantly Decreases Cecal Intubation Time: A Prospective Single-Blinded Pilot Study.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Jun;27(6):564-570. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0649. Epub 2017 Apr 4. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017. PMID: 28375709 Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of abdominal compression devices on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Curr Med Res Opin. 2023 Sep;39(9):1247-1256. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2243214. Epub 2023 Aug 18. Curr Med Res Opin. 2023. PMID: 37526014
-
The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;107(8):1165-73. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.135. Epub 2012 Jun 5. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22664471 Review.
References
-
- Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, Bretthauer M, Rees CJ, Dekker E, Hoff G, Jover R, Suchanek S, Ferlitsch M, Anderson J, Roesch T, Hultcranz R, Racz I, Kuipers EJ, Garborg K, East JE, Rupinski M, Seip B, Bennett C, Senore C, Minozzi S, Bisschops R, Domagk D, Valori R, Spada C, Hassan C, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rutter MD (2017) Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-103411 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty BM, Lieb JG 2nd, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS (2015) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Vleugels JLA, Van Lanschot MCJ, Dekker E (2016) Colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy: putting it into perspective. Dig Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12533 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hoff G, Botteri E, Huppertz-Hauss G, Kvamme JM, Holme Ø, Aabakken L, Dahler S, Medhus AW, Blomgren I, Sandvei P, Darre-Næss O, Kjellevold Ø, Seip B (2021) The effect of train-the-colonoscopy-trainer course on colonoscopy quality indicators. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1352-4583 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Shahidi N, Ou G, Telford J, Enns R (2014) Establishing the learning curve for achieving competency in performing colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.056 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical