Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):180.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03728-w.

Incidence and risk factors of postpartum urinary retention following cesarean section: a retrospective nationwide inpatient sample database study

Affiliations

Incidence and risk factors of postpartum urinary retention following cesarean section: a retrospective nationwide inpatient sample database study

Fufei Zhang et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the risk factors associated with postpartum urinary retention after cesarean section (CS) and to determine the associated morbidity rate.

Methods: This study was a population-based retrospective case-control study analyzed using National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2010 to 2019. The study classified women according to whether they developed postpartum urinary retention after delivery. Predictors of postpartum urinary retention occurring after CS were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the corresponding incidence rates were examined after adjusting for basic maternal demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results: A total of 2,397,168 CSs were extracted from the NIS database. The overall incidence of urinary retention after CS was 0.20%. Patients who experienced urinary retention after CS demonstrated longer length of stay (LOS), higher total costs, and more postoperative complications. The following variables have been identified as potential risk factors for urinary retention: age between 25 and 34 years (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.17-1.38; P < 0.001), 35 years and older (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.22-1.48; P < 0.001), Asian and Pacific Islander (OR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.68-2.05; P < 0.001), one comorbidity (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.28-1.79; P < 0.001), two comorbidities (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.09-2.08; P = 0.013), three and more comorbidities (OR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.06-3.04; P = 0.031), large hospitals (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.07-1.26; P < 0.001), teaching hospitals (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.79-2.07; P < 0.001), eastern hospitals (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.14-1.35; P < 0.001), coagulation disorders (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.08-1.61), fluid and electrolyte disorders (OR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.94-3.11), other neurological disorders (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.20-1.89), paralysis (OR = 3.24; 95% CI = 1.95-5.38), and weight loss (OR = 2.34;95% CI = 1.26-4.35). In addition, urinary retention was associated with postoperative complications related to bladder or ureteral injury (OR = 6.12; 95% CI = 2.46-15.23), blood transfusion (OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.31-1.76), acute renal failure (OR = 4.74; 95% CI = 3.46-6.48), respiratory failure (OR = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.23-3.98), endometritis (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.02-1.71), hemorrhage/hematoma ( OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.38-4.62), uterine rupture (OR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.21-2.54), hysterectomy (OR = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.66-3.18), peritonitis (OR = 2.86; 95% CI = 1.03-7.92), severe puerperal infections (OR = 3.31; 95% CI = 2.60- 4.22), chorioamnionitis (OR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.59-2.00). Notably, the presence of cephalopelvic disproportion (OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.11-1.67), breech or other fetal position abnormalities (OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.00-1.20), placenta previa (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.06-1.84), multiple gestation (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.23-1.58), anatomy of the bladder (OR = 3.93; 95% CI = 1.42-10.90), bladder catheter placement (OR = 22.57; 95% CI = 20.24-25.17) and intravenous infusion (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.09-1.36) was associated with a significantly increased risk of urinary retention, while low cervical CS (OR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.50-0.76), previous CS (OR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.82-0.93) and prolapsed cord (OR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.31-0.86) conferred some protective effect against it.

Conclusion: In this study, we identified an overall prevalence of 0.20% for urinary retention after CS and several risk factors, including advanced maternal age, Asian and Pacific Islander background, comorbidities, and delivery in large or teaching hospitals, particularly in the Eastern region. Protective factors included hospitals in the southern region, urban hospitals, obesity, and hypertension. Urinary retention was associated with increased postoperative complications, longer LOS, and higher healthcare costs. Several confounders also significantly influenced the incidence of urinary retention. To mitigate these risks, healthcare professionals should prioritize antenatal screening, manage comorbidities, and closely monitor high-risk patients during the postpartum period to reduce adverse outcomes.

Keywords: Cesarean section; National Inpatient Sample; Postpartum urinary retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This article does not involve any research on human participants or animals. This observational study used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, a publicly available, research-specific dataset. As is the case with other studies utilizing the NIS, this study did not require ethical review, as the data are anonymised and cannot be linked to any individuals. The NIS dataset has been rigorously desensitised to ensure the security of individual privacy. Researchers use these data solely for statistical analyses or scientific research, with no direct impact on individuals. Therefore, in accordance with relevant ethical review regulations, no consent from individuals is required [78–80]. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow and inclusion/exclusion of all patients had CS
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Annual incidence of postpartum urinary retention in patients undergoing CS
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationship between urinary retention and preoperative comorbidities
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relationship between urinary retention and intraoperative/postoperative complications
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Relationship between urinary retention and confounders

Similar articles

References

    1. Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. J Perinat Med. 2021;49:5–16. - PubMed
    1. 冯艳丽. Cesarean Delivery Perinatal Complications Management Result Analysis. Advances in Clinical Medicine. 2019;09:711–4.
    1. Gonzalo-Carballes M, Ríos-Vives MÁ, Fierro EC, Azogue XG, Herrero SG, Rodríguez AE, et al. A Pictorial Review of Postpartum Complications. Radiographics. 2020;40:2117–41. - PubMed
    1. Nutaitis AC, Meckes NA, Madsen AM, Toal CT, Menhaji K, Carter-Brooks CM, et al. Postpartum urinary retention: an expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:14–21. - PubMed
    1. Tiberon A, Carbonnel M, Vidart A, Ben Halima M, Deffieux X, Ayoubi J-M. Risk factors and management of persistent postpartum urinary retention. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47:437–41. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources