Fluid balance and outcome in cardiac arrest patients admitted to intensive care unit
- PMID: 40229890
- PMCID: PMC11998186
- DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05391-x
Fluid balance and outcome in cardiac arrest patients admitted to intensive care unit
Abstract
Background: Although shock following cardiac arrest is common and contributes significantly to mortality, the influence of the modalities used to manage the hemodynamic situation, particularly with regard to fluid balance, remains unclear. We evaluated the association between positive fluid balance and outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Methods: We conducted a multicenter study from August 2020 to June 2022, which consecutively enrolled adult OHCA patients in 17 intensive care units. The primary endpoint was 90-day survival. Multivariate Cox analysis, propensity score matching and landmark analysis were performed, along with several sensitivity analyses.
Results: Of the 816 patients included in our study, 74% had a positive fluid balance, and 291 of 816 patients (36%) were alive at 90-day. A positive fluid balance was associated with mortality after adjusted multivariate analysis (HR = 1.8 [1.3 - 2.3], p < 0.001), after propensity score matching (n = 193 matched patient pairs, HR = 1.6 [1.1 - 2.1], p = 0.005) and after landmark analysis. We reported a dose-dependent association between fluid balance and mortality. Patients with a positive fluid balance were more likely to need renal replacement therapy (10% vs. 2%, p = 0.001) and had a lower minimum PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the first seven days (158 vs. 180, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: After cardiac arrest, a positive fluid balance is consistently associated with a worse outcome. Pending further data, a restrictive fluid therapy strategy may be beneficial in post-OHCA patients.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov cohort AfterROSC-1 NCT04167891 registered November 13th, 2019, ethics committees 2019-A01378-49 and CPP-SMIV 190901.
Keywords: Epidemiology; Fluid balance; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Outcome.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was conducted according to the Strengthening The Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology guidelines, and the cohort was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov before the first patient was enrolled (Cohort AfterROSC-1, NCT04167891 registered November 13th, 2019)(8). The research protocol was approved by the relevant ethics committees (2019-A01378-49; CPP-SMIV 190901) and the French data protection authorities, according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. According to French law, patients or relatives were informed of their inclusion in this study, an information notice was provided to them, and their non-opposition was documented. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures



References
-
- Bougouin W, Lamhaut L, Marijon E, Jost D, Dumas F, Deye N, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of sudden cardiac death in Greater Paris: Population-based approach from the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center (Paris—SDEC). Intensive Care Med juin. 2014;40(6):846–54. - PubMed
-
- Lemiale V, Dumas F, Mongardon N, Giovanetti O, Charpentier J, Chiche JD, et al. Intensive care unit mortality after cardiac arrest: the relative contribution of shock and brain injury in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(11):1972–80. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical