Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 31:13:1505963.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1505963. eCollection 2025.

Host-microbe-cancer interactions on-a-chip

Affiliations
Review

Host-microbe-cancer interactions on-a-chip

Mauricio G C Sousa et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

The tumor microbiota has emerged as a pivotal contributor to a variety of cancers, impacting disease development, progression, and therapeutic resistance. Due to the complexity of the tumor microenvironment, reproducing the interactions between the microbes, tumor cells, and the immune system remains a great challenge for both in vitro and in vivo studies. To this end, significant progress has been made toward leveraging tumor-on-a-chip model systems to replicate critical hallmarks of the native disease in vitro. These microfluidic platforms offer the ability to mimic essential components of the tumor microenvironment, including controllable fluid flow conditions, manipulable extracellular matrix dynamics, and intricate 3D multi-cellular communication. The primary objective of this review is to discuss recent challenges and advances in engineering host-microbiota and tumor interactions on-a-chip. Ultimately, overcoming these obstacles will help us gain deeper insights into tumor-microbe interactions and enhance avenues for developing more effective cancer therapies.

Keywords: host-microbes; microbes; microfluidic devices; tissue engineering; tumor on-a-chip.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Tumor on-a-chip as platforms to emulate the host-microbe interactions in early oncogenesis and inflammation. These models can be used to emulate essential hallmarks of the tumor microenvironment, such as shear stress, hypoxia, a 3D matrix, different cell types, and interactions with several bacteria, fungi, viruses, archaea, parasites, and their sub-products (A). In (B) reproduced from Min et al. (2022) a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chip was used to understand the role of probiotics in reestablishing gut homeostasis. Chips that were treated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LLG) or a complex mixture VSL#3 could reduce inflammatory and carcinogenic signaling pathways (p65 – magenta, pSTAT3 - cyan, and MYD88) after 3 days [(C, D) scale bar – 50 µm]. In (E, F), reproduced from de Gregorio et al. (2022), the authors developed a device that features an open central chamber accommodating a transwell membrane separating the lumen and serosal sides to emulate a human intestine on-a-chip (hi-oC) (E). The authors observed that lipopolysaccharide (hl-oCLPS) would stimulate a higher inflammatory response compared to the hi-oC (F), and the probiotics (Mihl-oCLPS) improved tight junction formation and mucus production (G). Scales bars in (F, G) represent 100 µm. Parts of this figure were created with biorender.com. This figure was licensed under a common creative attribution [CC by 4.0 Spring Nature–(B–D) and Elsevier (E–G)].
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Applications of on-chip models to understand host-microbe interactions in cancer for colorectal cancer (A, B), breast cancer (C, D), and oral mucosa/head and neck (E, F). In (A), Penarete-Acosta et al. (2024) developed a colorectal tumor on-a-chip to evaluate the effect of F. nucleatum in modulating the microbiome. They found that this microorganism is responsible for increasing the abundance of pro-inflammatory microorganisms (B). In (C), reproduced from Brasino et al., developed microfluidic devices that can keep patient-derived organoid viability (C) while communicating with the gut microbiome (D). These polycarbonate chips allow researchers to study hypoxic environments (gut) while connecting those systems with other distal tissues (D). In (E, F), reproduced from Rahimi et al. (2018), a PDMS device was designed to mimic the oral mucosa interaction with microorganisms. These devices have a central chamber containing gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) in collagen and a layer of keratinocytes (E). Although the authors just evaluated the species S. mutans (F), this platform can be used to study how oral pathobiont microorganisms can interact with head and neck cancers. This figure was licensed under a common creative attribution (CC by 4.0 Royal Chemical Society, Wiley and Elsevier). (E, F) was reproduced from [Christopher Rahimi, Benjamin Rahimi, Dominic Padova, Seyed A. Rooholghodos, Diane R. Bienek, Xiaolong Luo, Gili Kaufman, Christopher B. Raub; Oral mucosa-on-a-chip to assess layer-specific responses to bacteria and dental materials. Biomicrofluidics 1 September 2018; 12 (5): 054106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5048938], with the permission of AIP Publishing.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aizpurua O., Blijleven K., Trivedi U., Gilbert M. T. P., Alberdi A. (2023). Unravelling animal-microbiota evolution on a chip. Trends Microbiol. 31 (10), 995–1002. 10.1016/j.tim.2023.04.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almela T., Tayebi L., Moharamzadeh K. (2021). 3D bioprinting for in vitro models of oral cancer: toward development and validation. Bioprinting 22, e00132. 10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00132 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asghar W., El Assal R., Shafiee H., Pitteri S., Paulmurugan R., Demirci U. (2015). Engineering cancer microenvironments for in vitro 3-D tumor models. Mater TodayKidlingt. 18 (10), 539–553. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.05.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker J. L., Mark Welch J. L., Kauffman K. M., McLean J. S., He X. (2023). The oral microbiome: diversity, biogeography and human health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 89–104. 10.1038/s41579-023-00963-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker J. L., Mark Welch J. L., Kauffman K. M., McLean J. S., He X. (2024). The oral microbiome: diversity, biogeography and human health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22 (2), 89–104. 10.1038/s41579-023-00963-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources