Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 4:13:a25442468.
doi: 10.1055/a-2544-2468. eCollection 2025.

Outcomes of retained gastrointestinal debris during upper endoscopy

Jake Sheraj Jacob  1 , Jeffrey Than  2 , Christine Tang  3 , Joseph Cano  4 , Rehman Sheikh  3 , Sharon Wolfson  5 , Aaron P Thrift  6   7 , Uma Munnur  8 , Robert J Sealock  3
Affiliations

Outcomes of retained gastrointestinal debris during upper endoscopy

Jake Sheraj Jacob et al. Endosc Int Open. .

Abstract

Background and study aims: Gastrointestinal debris retention (GIDR) during endoscopy can result in aborted procedures, intubation, and aspiration. GIDR has increased significance with uptake of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use. Outcome analysis is vital to risk-stratify patients with GIDR during endoscopy. Our study evaluated the effect of GIDR on endoscopic complications.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopy between May 2016 and December 2021 with documented GIDR. The study included 138 patients with GIDR and 275 controls. Propensity score matching between patients with GIDR and controls was performed in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. T-tests and chi square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables.

Results: The GIDR group was younger and had lower BMI, with no difference in sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, or use of monitored anesthesia care. GIDR was more frequently encountered when indications were abnormal imaging, pain, and pancreatico-biliary. Amount of GIDR was quantified as "large" in 37.7% of cases and size of debris was associated with rate of aborted procedures.

Conclusions: Our study did not demonstrate a significant increase in post-procedure complications in patients with GIDR. Further, the GIDR group had higher rates of opiate use, which can guide stratification of retention risk.

Keywords: Endoscopy Upper GI Tract; Motility / achalasia; Performance and complications; Quality and logistical aspects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Saied N, Chopra A, Agarwal B. Parenteral erythromycin for potential use to empty retained gastric contents encountered during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Open J Gastroenterol. 2012;2:119.
    1. Aldawsari M, Almadani FA, Almuhammadi N et al.The efficacy of glp-1 analogues on appetite parameters, gastric emptying, food preference and taste among adults with obesity: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023;16:575–595. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting . Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:376–393. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prout BJ, Metreweli C. Pulmonary aspiration after fibre-endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Br Med J. 1972;4:269–271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5835.269. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson A, Tye-Din J, Tonga S et al.Aspiration in the context of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21:223–225. doi: 10.1155/2007/307937. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources