Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May-Jun;15(3):576-584.
doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.03.013. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

Propolis nanoemulsion extract from celebes stingless bee (Tetragonula biroi) phytochemistry and antibacterial analysis to periodontopathogen bacteria

Affiliations

Propolis nanoemulsion extract from celebes stingless bee (Tetragonula biroi) phytochemistry and antibacterial analysis to periodontopathogen bacteria

Nadya Rafika Amalia et al. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Propolis from Sulawesi's stingless bees (Tetragonula biroi) contains antioxidants, more flavonoids than propolis from Apis bees, and the antibacterial ability.

Objective: to examine the antibacterial properties of Propolis Nanoemulsion Extract (PNE), which is extracted from the Celebes Stingless Bee (T. biroi), in relation to the periodontopathogen bacteria such as Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), and Provotella intermedia (Pi). This investigation also examines PNE's phytochemistry, particle size analysis (PSA), and zeta potential.

Methods: The maceration process with 96 % ethanol was used to create PNE from Celebes stingless bee (T. biroi), which was then subjected to zeta potential measurement and PSA. Phytochemical analysis was used to identify phytochemical constituents in the PNE (T. biroi). Diffusion zone, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were used to assess antibacterial efficacy against Aa, Pg, Pi, and Fn. Furthermore, the statistical analysis was used to extract the data.

Results: Phenols, alkaloids, and flavonoids were identified; however, triterpenoids and saponins were not. Between 151.28 and 182.2 diameter nanometers (d.nm) was the range of the PNE's diameter. At 1.56 % propolis (T. biroi) concentration, the MIC, MBC, and diffusion zone analysis performed better than at 0.76 %, with a significant difference (p:0.01; p < 0.05) to Aa, Pg, Pi, and Fn.

Conclusions: The highest antibacterial activity against Aa, Pg, Pi, and Fn as periodontopathogen bacteria is demonstrated by alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenols in PNE from Celebes (T. biroi) at a concentration of 1.56 %.

Keywords: Antibacterial; Communicable disease; Infectious disease; Medicine; Periodontal disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Stingless Bee Propolis (T. biori) Nanoemulsion Phytochemistry analysis and (B) Particle Size Analyzer 1 % PNE has a size of 151.28 dnm and 182.2 dnm.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Antibacterial activity of 1 % PNE against Aa at concentration 1.56 %. (A): MIC of Aa. (B): MBC of Aa. (C): Diffusion zone of Aa. Bar data chart of (D) MIC of Aa; (E) MBC of Aa; (F) Diffusion zone of Aa. Description: significant different at ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Antibacterial activity of 1 % PNE against Pg at concentration 1.56 %. (A): MIC of Pg. (B): MBC of Pg. (C): Diffusion zone of Pg. Bar data chart of (D) MIC of Pg; (E) MBC of Pg; (F) Diffusion zone of Pg. Description: significant different at ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Antibacterial activity of 1 % PNE against Fn at concentration 1.56 %. (A): MIC of Fn. (B): MBC of Fn. (C): Diffusion zone of Fn. Bar data chart of (D) MIC of Fn; (E) MBC of Fn; (F) Diffusion zone of Fn. Description: significant different at ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Antibacterial activity of 1 % PNE against Pi at concentration 1.56 %. (A): MIC of Pi. (B): MBC of Pi. (C): Diffusion zone of Pi. Bar data chart of (D) MIC of Pi; (E) MBC of Pi; (F) Diffusion zone of Pi. Description: significant different at ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.001.

References

    1. Gasner N.S., Schure R.S. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing; April 10, 2023. Periodontal disease.
    1. Lertpimonchai A., Rattanasiri S., Arj-Ong Vallibhakara S., Attia J., Thakkinstian A. The association between oral hygiene and periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Dent J. 2017;67(6):332–343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jung W.R., Joo J.Y., Lee J.Y., Kim H.J. Prevalence and abundance of 9 periodontal pathogens in the saliva of periodontally healthy adults and patients undergoing supportive periodontal therapy. J Period Implant Sci. 2021;51(5):316–328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chipirliu O., Crăciun M.V., Matei M.N. Clinical study and microbiological analysis of periodontopathogenic microflora analyzed among children and adolescents with cardiovascular diseases compared to group with good general status. Pediatr Rep. 2024;16(2):482–503. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim J., Amar S. Periodontal disease and systemic conditions: a bidirectional relationship. Odontology. 2006;94(1):10–21. - PMC - PubMed