Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 15;19(1):157.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02257-w.

Seven years of pediatric robotic-assisted surgery: insights from 105 procedures

Affiliations

Seven years of pediatric robotic-assisted surgery: insights from 105 procedures

Ciro Esposito et al. J Robot Surg. .

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has recently expanded its role in pediatric patients. We conducted a retrospective review of 105 cases over 7 years (2017-2024) to evaluate outcomes, efficiency, and training experiences. A total of 105 children (58 boys, 47 girls) aged 2-15 years underwent robotic-assisted procedures using the Da Vinci Xi system. The most common indications were ureteropelvic junction obstruction (n = 33), varicocele (n = 29), and primary obstructive megaureter (n = 16). Two senior surgeons performed the procedures, training seven junior surgeons via the dual-console system. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests for docking time and operative duration comparisons, and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Docking time significantly improved over time from 45 to 15 min (median 25 min) (p = 0.001). The total operative time significantly decreased over time (p = 0.001), with a median of 125 min (range 50-250). Robotic system-related issues were reported in 3/105 (2.8%). Conversion to laparoscopy was necessary in 1 (0.9%). Postoperative complications (Clavien grade 3b) occurred in 2/105 (1.8%) patients, requiring reintervention. The median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-7). Monthly case volume increased from 1-2 to 4-7. Our 7 year experience with pediatric RAS demonstrates its safety, effectiveness, and growing role, especially in pediatric urology. It offers ergonomic advantages and facilitates training but is still limited by cost, larger instrument size (8 mm), and longer setup times compared to laparoscopy. Future developments, such as smaller robotic instruments and single-port technology, may help overcome these limitations and expand the applicability of RAS to younger and smaller patients.

Keywords: Learning curves; Pediatric urology; Pediatrics; Robot; Robotic-assisted surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Federico II University of Naples, Italy (approval number 2024/Z953).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O (2016) 30 Years of Robotic Surgery. World J Surg 40(10):2550–2557. 10.1007/s00268-016-3543-9 - PubMed
    1. Tesoro S, Gamba P, Bertozzi M, Borgogni R, Caramelli F, Cobellis G et al (2022) Pediatric robotic surgery: issues in management-expert consensus from the italian society of pediatric and neonatal anesthesia and intensive care (SARNePI) and the italian society of pediatric surgery (SICP). Surg Endosc 36(11):7877–7897. 10.1007/s00464-022-09577-0 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saxena AK, Borgogni R, Escolino M, D’Auria D, Esposito C (2023) Narrative review: robotic pediatric surgery-current status and future perspectives. Transl Pediatr. 10.21037/tp-22-427 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esposito C, Blanc T, Lardy H, Masieri L, Fourcade L, Mendoza-Sagaon M, Nappo S, Lopez M, Pelizzo G, Steyaert H, Gamba P, Scuderi MG, Escolino M, Castagnetti M, Chiarenza F, El Ghoneimi A (2022) Robotic surgery in pediatric urology: a critical appraisal of the GECI and SIVI Consensus of european experts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 32(10):1108–1113. 10.1089/lap.2021.0837 - PubMed
    1. Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–1655. 10.1007/s00464-018-6079-2 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources