Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255322.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5322.

Screening History, Stage at Diagnosis, and Mortality in Screen-Detected Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Screening History, Stage at Diagnosis, and Mortality in Screen-Detected Breast Cancer

Sida Huang et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Screening mammography promotes early detection of breast cancer and is associated with reduced breast cancer mortality. Screening history prior to diagnosis may impact stage at diagnosis and breast cancer mortality but has not been comprehensively examined within a diverse US cohort.

Objective: To determine whether having a prior screening is associated with earlier stage at breast cancer diagnosis and lower breast cancer-specific mortality.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data of women aged at least 70 years, diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer from 2010 to 2017, and enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare Parts A and B from 5 years prior to through 1 year after diagnosis. Data were analyzed from March 1 to September 18, 2024.

Exposure: Presence of 1 or more screening mammograms during the 5 years prior to the mammogram at breast cancer diagnosis.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes of interest were stage of breast cancer at diagnosis, dichotomized into very early (T1N0) vs later stage (T2+ or N1+) and breast cancer-specific mortality.

Results: Among 13 028 included women, most had at least 1 prior screening (10 094 women [77.5%]) and were aged between 70 and 79 years (9034 women [69.4%]) and not dual-eligible for Medicare and Medicaid (11 475 women [88.1%]). Additionally, 3812 women (29.3%) were diagnosed with later-stage disease (T2+ or N1+) at the time of diagnosis. In multivariable analyses, prior screening was associated with 54% lower odds of later-stage breast cancer diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.42-0.50) and 36% lower hazard of breast cancer-specific death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76) compared with no prior screenin. In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, having 3 or 4 prior screenings was associated with 37% reduced hazard of breast cancer-specific mortality compared with having 1 prior screening (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of older women with screen-detected estrogen receptor-positive or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, prior screening mammography was associated with earlier stage at breast cancer diagnosis and lower breast cancer mortality. These findings support the potential for routine screening to improve breast cancer outcomes. As with all observational studies, this study is limited by the potential effects of other differences between the screening and nonscreening groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lustberg reported receiving personal fees from Novartis, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sanko, Menarini, and Lilly and grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Lewin reported receiving personal fees from Novian Health outside the submitted work. Dr Dinan reported receiving grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and American Cancer Society (ACS). No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart for Cohort Construction
ER+ indicates estrogen receptor positive; ERBB2−, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Adjusted Associations of Patient Factors With History of Screening
AWV indicates annual wellness visit; PCP, primary care physician. aIncluding American Indian or Alaska Native and Pacific Islander and those with unreported or missing race and ethnicity.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Adjusted Associations of History of Screening and Other Covariates With Stage at Diagnosis
AWV indicates annual wellness visit; PCP, primary care physician. aIncluding American Indian or Alaska Native and Pacific Islander and those with unreported or missing race and ethnicity.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Adjusted Associations of History of Screening With Breast Cancer–Specific Mortality
The model was adjusted for American Joint Committee on Cancer overall stage, tumor grade, receipt of surgery, frailty status, any primary care physician (PCP) visit or annual wellness visit (AWV), number of influenza vaccines, area-level poverty, and year of diagnosis, in addition to the covariates in the figure. Hazard ratios of these covariates were not reported due to the violation of the proportional hazard assumption. However, stage, tumor grade, receipt of surgery, frailty prior to diagnosis, and area-level poverty had a statistically significant association with breast cancer–specific mortality. aIncluding American Indian or Alaska Native and Pacific Islander and those with unreported or missing race and ethnicity.

References

    1. Nicholson WK, Silverstein M, Wong JB, et al. ; US Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2024;331(22):1918-1930. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.5534 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Niraula S, Biswanger N, Hu P, Lambert P, Decker K. Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of interval breast cancers compared with screening-detected breast cancers. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9):e2018179. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18179 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Census Bureau . Age and sex composition in the United States: 2023. Accessed February 5, 2025. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2023/demo/age-and-sex/2023-age-sex-co...
    1. Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, et al. ; Breast Cancer Working Group of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network . Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):738-747. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richman IB, Long JB, Soulos PR, Wang SY, Gross CP. Estimating breast cancer overdiagnosis after screening mammography among older women in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(9):1172-1180. doi:10.7326/M23-0133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types