Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0321728.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321728. eCollection 2025.

Clinical feature and gene expression analysis in low prostate-specific antigen, high-grade prostate cancer

Affiliations

Clinical feature and gene expression analysis in low prostate-specific antigen, high-grade prostate cancer

Peng Zhang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels can occasionally present high-grade disease. These patients often exhibit resistance to androgen deprivation therapy and have poor outcomes. The mechanisms underlying these observations remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and potential gene expression mechanisms in this subgroup.

Patients and methods: Clinical data from 365,558 PCa patients were categorized into four groups based on PSA levels and Gleason score (GS): Group 1 (PSA ≤ 2.5 ng/mL, GS < 8), Group 2 (PSA ≤ 2.5 ng/mL, GS ≥ 8), Group 3 (PSA > 2.5 ng/mL, GS < 8), and Group 4 (PSA > 2.5 ng/mL, GS ≥ 8). Clinical characteristics were compared using Kruskal-Wallis H and Pearson's chi-squared tests. Competing-risks regression assessed prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on 219 PCa patients to compare Group A (PSA ≤ 2.5 ng/mL, GS ≥ 8) with Group B (PSA > 2.5 ng/mL, GS ≥ 8).

Results: Group 2 had a significantly higher tumor stage (p < 0.001) and increased hazard ratio for PCSM (p < 0.001). GSEA in Group A identified 156 upregulated gene sets and highlighted several enriched pathways, including the polycomb repressive complex 2, the epidermal growth factor receptor family, retrograde axonal transport, the tumor necrosis factor/nuclear factor-κB pathway, the Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor/RhoA pathway, and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathways (p < 0.05, false discovery rate-adjusted p < 0.25).

Conclusion: PCa patients with low PSA levels and high GS demonstrated an increased risk of PCSM. They were characterized by the aberrant activation of multiple signaling pathways. Targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at these pathways warrant further investigation for their potential to improve outcomes in this aggressive PCa subtype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of the patient cohort selection.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Cumulative incidence function of PCSM across groups.
Abbreviation: PCSM = prostate cancer-specific mortality.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Top three most significant gene sets identified in GSEA of the GEO Cohort.
Abbreviation: GSEA = Gene set enrichment analysis, GEO = Gene Expression Omnibus, IGF = insulin-like growth factor, IGFR = insulin-like growth factor receptor, PI3K = phosphoinositide 3-kinase, NF-κB = nuclear factor-κB, EGF = epidermal growth factor, EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Network visualization of enriched pathways based on GSEA results.
Abbreviation: GSEA = Gene set enrichment analysis, PRC = polycomb repressive complex, EGF = epidermal growth factor, ERBB2 = erythroblastic oncogene B 2, RAS = rat sarcoma virus, ERK = extracellular signal-regulated kinase, EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor, PI3K = phosphoinositide 3-kinase, HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, TNF = tumor necrosis factor, NF-κB = nuclear factor-κB, GEF = guanine nucleotide exchange factor, GF = growth factor, RTK = receptor tyrosine kinase, NES = normalized enrichment scores.

Similar articles

References

    1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N, An Y, Bitting R, Chapin B, et al.. Prostate cancer Guideline (version 4.2024). National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2024. May 17 [Cited May 19 2024}. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf.
    1. Ito S, Liu X, Ishikawa Y, Conti DD, Otomo N, Kote-Jarai Z, et al.. Androgen receptor binding sites enabling genetic prediction of mortality due to prostate cancer in cancer-free subjects. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4863. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39858-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Senapati D, Sharma V, Rath SK, Rai U, Panigrahi N. Functional implications and therapeutic targeting of androgen response elements in prostate cancer. Biochimie. 2023;214(Pt B):188–98. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2023.07.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, et al.. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2024 update. part I: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2024;86(2):148–63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027 - DOI - PubMed

Substances