Integration of protein stability and AlphaMissense scores improves bioinformatic impact prediction for p53 missense and in-frame amino acid deletion variants
- PMID: 40233742
- PMCID: PMC12120181
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.01.012
Integration of protein stability and AlphaMissense scores improves bioinformatic impact prediction for p53 missense and in-frame amino acid deletion variants
Abstract
The clinical classification of germline missense variants and single-amino-acid deletions is challenging. The BayesDel and Align-GVGD bioinformatic prediction tools currently used for ClinGen TP53 variant curation expert panel (VCEP) classification do not directly capture changes in protein folding stability, measured using computed destabilization energies (ΔΔG scores). The AlphaMissense tool recently developed by Google DeepMind to predict pathogenicity for all human proteome missense variants is trained in part using AlphaFold2 architecture. Our study investigated whether protein folding stability and/or AlphaMissense scores could improve impact prediction for p53 missense and single-amino-acid deletion variants. ΔΔG scores were calculated for missense variants using FoldX and for single-amino-acid deletions using an AlphaFold2/RosettaRelax protocol. Residue surface exposure was categorized using relative solvent accessibility (RSA) measures. The predictive values of ΔΔG scores, AlphaMissense, BayesDel, and Align-GVGD were examined using Boruta and binary logistic regression based on functionally defined reference sets. The likelihood ratio (LR) toward pathogenicity was estimated and used to refine optimal categories for predicting variant pathogenicity for different RSA values. We showed that current VCEP predictive approaches for missense variants were improved by integrating ΔΔG scores ≥2.5 kcal/mol for partially buried and buried residues, but better performance was achieved using AlphaMissense with ΔΔG and RSA. For deletion variants, ΔΔG scores ≥4.8 Rosetta energy unit (REU) in buried residues outperformed currently used predictive approaches. Future TP53 VCEP specifications for p53 missense impact prediction may consider AlphaMissense, ΔΔG score, and RSA combined for substitution variants and ΔΔG score alone for deletion variants.
Keywords: ACMG/AMP; AlphaMissense; BP4; PP3; TP53; bioinformatic predictions; protein stability; relative solvent accessibility; variant classification; ΔΔG.
Copyright © 2025 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests M.J.V., A.C.C., and M.E.R. are employees of Ambry Genetics.
Similar articles
-
ACMG/AMP interpretation of BRCA1 missense variants: Structure-informed scores add evidence strength granularity to the PP3/BP4 computational evidence.Am J Hum Genet. 2025 May 1;112(5):993-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.12.011. Epub 2025 Apr 14. Am J Hum Genet. 2025. PMID: 40233743 Free PMC article.
-
Improved, ACMG-compliant, in silico prediction of pathogenicity for missense substitutions encoded by TP53 variants.Hum Mutat. 2018 Aug;39(8):1061-1069. doi: 10.1002/humu.23553. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Hum Mutat. 2018. PMID: 29775997 Free PMC article.
-
A quantitative model to predict pathogenicity of missense variants in the TP53 gene.Hum Mutat. 2019 Jun;40(6):788-800. doi: 10.1002/humu.23739. Epub 2019 Mar 18. Hum Mutat. 2019. PMID: 30840781
-
Analysis and Interpretation of the Impact of Missense Variants in Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 21;22(11):5416. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115416. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34063805 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Protein structure-based evaluation of missense variants: Resources, challenges and future directions.Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2023 Jun;80:102600. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102600. Epub 2023 Apr 29. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2023. PMID: 37126977 Review.
Cited by
-
Structural biology in variant interpretation: Perspectives and practices from two studies.Am J Hum Genet. 2025 May 1;112(5):984-992. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.03.010. Epub 2025 Apr 14. Am J Hum Genet. 2025. PMID: 40233741 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous