Comparative analysis of two rates
- PMID: 4023479
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780040211
Comparative analysis of two rates
Abstract
In this paper, we examine comparative analysis of rates with a view to each of the usual comparative parameters-rate difference (RD), rate ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR)-and with particular reference to first principles. For RD and RR we show the prevailing statistical practices to be rather poor. We stress the need for restricted estimation of variance in the chi-square function underlying interval estimation (and also point estimation and hypothesis testing). For RR analysis we propose a chi-square formulation analogous to that for RD and, thus, one which obviates the present practice of log transformation and its associated use of Taylor series approximation of the variance. As for OR analysis, we emphasize that the chi-square function, introduced by Cornfield for unstratified data, and extended by Gart to the case of stratified analysis, is based on the efficient score and thus embodies its optimality properties. We provide simulation results to evince the better performance of the proposed (parameter-constrained) procedures over the traditional ones.
Similar articles
-
Confidence interval estimation for the ratio of simple and standardized rates in cohort studies.Biometrics. 1983 Jun;39(2):325-31. Biometrics. 1983. PMID: 6626660
-
Analysis of epidemiologic case-base studies for binary data.Stat Med. 1989 Oct;8(10):1241-54. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780081008. Stat Med. 1989. PMID: 2814072
-
Marginal modeling of binary cross-over data.Biometrics. 1993 Dec;49(4):997-1009. Biometrics. 1993. PMID: 8117910
-
Approximate interval estimation of the difference in binomial parameters: correction for skewness and extension to multiple tables.Biometrics. 1990 Sep;46(3):637-43. Biometrics. 1990. PMID: 2242407
-
Statistical inference from qualitative data: proportions, relative risks and odds ratios.Indian Pediatr. 2000 Sep;37(9):967-81. Indian Pediatr. 2000. PMID: 10992333 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Lefamulin efficacy and safety in a pooled phase 3 clinical trial population with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and common clinical comorbidities.BMC Pulm Med. 2021 May 8;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01472-z. BMC Pulm Med. 2021. PMID: 33964925 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21223. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021223. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32702892 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Interventions for mycosis fungoides.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD008946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008946.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32632956 Free PMC article.
-
Ceftazidime-avibactam Versus Doripenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial Program.Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 15;63(6):754-762. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw378. Epub 2016 Jun 16. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 27313268 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The JNC 7 approach compared to conventional treatment in diabetic patients with hypertension: a double-blind trial of initial monotherapy vs. combination therapy.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2004 Aug;6(8):437-42; quiz 443-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03488.x. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2004. PMID: 15308882 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous