An Australian regional hospital's oesophagectomy experience: A 10-year case series from Tasmania
- PMID: 40236596
- PMCID: PMC11999446
- DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100279
An Australian regional hospital's oesophagectomy experience: A 10-year case series from Tasmania
Abstract
Introduction: Oesophagectomy is recommended as part of curative treatment for oesophageal cancer but is associated with substantial morbidity. Centralization has been recommended to improve outcomes, but this has not been widely applied in Australia. This study aimed to audit a regional hospital's experience over ten years and compare it to outcomes from national and international centres to support the view that oesophagectomy can be performed safely in select regional centres in Australia.
Methods: Patients undergoing oesophagectomy at a single regional hospital in North-East Tasmania, Australia between January 2014 and December 2023 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative patient and tumour characteristics, and outcomes (mortality, anastomotic leak, length of stay, respiratory complications, long-term complications and survival) were compared to other centres.
Results: 65 patients were identified. 53 % were male, mean age was 65.2 years, 29.2 % had respiratory disease and 18.5 % were current smokers. The anastomotic leak rate was 7.7 %. 25 % developed pneumonia postoperatively. Average ICU length of stay was 4.6 days, median acute inpatient length of stay was 15 days. There was one in-hospital mortality and one 30-day mortality. 2 patients (3 %) required diaphragmatic hernia repair; 12 patients (18.5 %) required endoscopic dilatation of anastomotic strictures. The 5-year survival rate was 66 %. Our results compare favourably to published rates of anastomotic leak (10-15 %), inpatient stay (15 days), pneumonia (20-30 %), 30-day mortality (1-4 %) and anastomotic stricture (20 %).
Conclusions: Oesophagectomies can be safely performed in regional centres in Australia that routinely undertake a higher volume of cases per year, provided services required to manage complications are readily available.
Keywords: Case series; Oesophagectomy; Regional surgery in Australia.
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy: a single-centre observational study.BMC Surg. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02253-7. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 38066440 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and outcomes after oesophagectomy in southern New Zealand: a 25-year audit of a low volume centre.ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jul;91(7-8):1509-1514. doi: 10.1111/ans.16644. Epub 2021 Feb 12. ANZ J Surg. 2021. PMID: 33576122
-
Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jun;49(6):1650-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv395. Epub 2015 Nov 15. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26574497
-
Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference?Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 Mar;69(3):187-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01520.x. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999. PMID: 10075357 Review.
-
Elderly patients have increased perioperative morbidity and mortality from oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):1828-1835. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.030. Epub 2021 Mar 27. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33814241
References
-
- Hummel R., Ha N.H., Lord A., Trochsler M.I., Maddern G., Kanhere H. Centralisation of oesophagectomy in Australia: is only caseload critical? Aust Health Rev. 2019;43(1):15–20. - PubMed
-
- Australian Bureau of Statistics . 2021. High level summary data for Tasmania.https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/snapshot-tas-2021 Accessed 21st October, 2024.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources