Sex differences in outcomes and time to treatment in stroke patients treated with tenecteplase
- PMID: 40237595
- PMCID: PMC12003326
- DOI: 10.1177/23969873251332497
Sex differences in outcomes and time to treatment in stroke patients treated with tenecteplase
Abstract
Introduction: A better understanding of sex-related differences remains key to improve stroke care for women. We aimed to assess the differences of prognosis, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates and process times between men and women suffering from ischemic stroke.
Patients and methods: We performed a sex-based retrospective analysis of the French Tenecteplase Treatment in Stroke multicentric registry from 2015 to 2021. We assessed sex differences in terms of 3-month good neurological outcome (defined as modified Rankin score ⩽ 2 or back to its pre-stroke value), occurrence of sICH and process times with multivariable logistic regression analyses.
Results: 1339 consecutive patients (684 women, 655 men) received tenecteplase between 2015 and 2021, among whom 873 underwent thrombectomy. Both groups differed in terms of demographic characteristics, etiology, and unclear onset. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, women and men did not differ in terms of 3-month good neurological outcome (aOR = 0.85 [0.63-1.13]). Women were less likely to have a sICH after tenecteplase (aOR = 0.35 [0.18-0.69]) and more likely to have a stroke of unknown onset (aOR 1.44 [1.07-1.95]), but workflow metrics did not differ once stroke code was triggered.
Discussion and conclusion: In our study, we did not find a significant difference between women and men in terms of 3-month good outcome. However, our study size may hinder its detection. Interestingly, we observed that women had a lower rate of sICH after tenecteplase. Women's workflow metrics were similar to men's, except for a higher rate of stroke with an unknown onset.
Keywords: Tenecteplase; acute ischemic stroke; sex-related difference.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: All reported disclosures were outside the submitted work. Dr Yger reports personal fees from Lundbeck. Dr. Marnat reports personal fees from Stryker, Medtronic and Microvention. Prof. Clarençon reports personal fees from Medtronic, Guerbet, Balt Extrusion, and Penumbra. Dr. Chausson reports a grant and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol Myers Squibb and personal fees from Stryker. Prof. Sibon reports personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, BMS-Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Elsevier, Novonordisk, Servier, and Medtronic. Prof. Alamowitch reports personal fees from the Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, BMS-Pfizer, and Elsevier. Dr Gerschenfeld reports personal fees from Truffle Capital. No other disclosures were reported.
Figures
References
-
- Cherian L. Women and ischemic stroke: disparities and outcomes. Neurol Clin 2023; 41: 265–281. - PubMed
-
- Ihle-Hansen H, Sandset EC, Ihle-Hansen H, et al.. Sex differences in the Norwegian Tenecteplase Trial (NOR-TEST). Eur J Neurol 2022; 29: 609–614. - PubMed
-
- Bushnell C, Howard VJ, Lisabeth L, et al.. Sex differences in the evaluation and treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 641–650. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources