Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Apr 16;51(1):175.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02848-0.

Pragmatic O-Positive Whole-blood RandoMizaTion in male trauma Patients (POWeR-MTP)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pragmatic O-Positive Whole-blood RandoMizaTion in male trauma Patients (POWeR-MTP)

Anthony M Strada et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: Hemorrhage is a significant cause of trauma-related death. Low-titer O-positive whole blood (LTOWB) is an alternative to component therapy (CT) [packed red blood cells (PRBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP)]. We evaluated if LTOWB reduces transfusion requirement or mortality.

Methods: Adult male trauma activations requiring uncrossmatched transfusion in the emergency department underwent nonblinded 24-hour block randomization to receive uncrossmatched LTOWB or CT in the emergency department (ED). Female patients, children, and known prisoners were excluded. If LTOWB was not available, CT was used. Primary outcome was transfusion requirement in patients surviving ≥ 24 h, with a subset analysis for patients undergoing hemorrhage control interventions (HCI). Dichotomous variables were evaluated with Chi-Square testing and continuous outcomes with Student's T-test.

Results: Overall, 199 patients were randomized (52 LTOWB, 147 CT); 36 patients (12 LTOWB, 24 CT) were excluded post-randomization for mortality within 24 h. The remaining 40 LTOWB and 123 CT patient cohorts had similar age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and temperature. LTOWB patients received 1.4 ± 0.75 LTOWB units. LTOWB patients trended toward less transfusion (PRBC [3.8 ± 5.6 vs. 5.7 ± 6.2 units, p = 0.077], FFP [2.3 ± 3.8 vs. 3.5 ± 4.3 units, p = 0.088], and CRYO [0.13 ± 0.34 vs. 0.28 ± 0.68 units, p = 0.061]). Mortality was similar (LTOWB:10.2% [4/39] vs. CT:10.5% [13/123], p = 0.956). LTOWB patients undergoing HCI had less transfusion than CT patients (PRBC [3.9 ± 5.1 vs. 7.4 ± 7.2 units, p = 0.013]; in the HCI cohort the differences were even more pronounced when severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) deaths were excluded (PRBC [3.0 ± 3.6 vs. 7.4 ± 7.2 units, p < 0.001], FFP [2.1 ± 2.3 vs. 4.5 ± 5.2 units, p = 0.005]).

Conclusion: LTOWB is associated with reduced PRBC transfusion in patients undergoing HCI, and a trend toward decreased PRBC, FFP, and CRYO transfusion in all patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05081063), posted 10/18/2021.

Keywords: Component therapy; Low-titer O-positive whole blood; Massive transfusion; Traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: KM has consulting relationships with Intuitive Surgical Inc., Prytime Inc., AcuMed Inc., and Costa Surgical Inc. KM is the site principal investigator for the PROMPT multicenter trial of a partial aortic occlusion catheter funded by the U.S. Department of Defense. KM is the stie principal investigator for an Intuitive Surgical Inc.-funded study of laparoscopic and robotic appendectomy.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient Randomization and Exclusion Schema. Adult male trauma patients who were the highest-level trauma activations were enrolled at the time that uncrossmatched blood transfusion was felt to be indicated by the trauma surgeon. Blocks A and B alternated every 24 h, with CT given during Block A and LTOWB given during Block B. After the supply of LTOWB was exhausted during Block B, further transfusion was given as 1:1:1 transfusion using CT. If no LTOWB was available during Block B, CT was used. Deaths in the ED and within 24 h of arrival were specifically excluded as the primary endpoint of transfusion requirement would be affected by survivor bias if early mortalities were not excluded. The final number of patients in the two groups was imbalanced due to supply constraints of LTOWB, resulting in a significant number of patients defaulting to CT
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Types of Hemorrhage Control Interventions Performed (some patients received multiple interventions). The operative or interventional procedures that were performed in the CT and LTOWB groups to achieve hemorrhage control are tabulated above

References

    1. Demetriades D, Murray J, Charalambides K, Alo K, Velmahos G, Rhee P, et al. Trauma fatalities time and location of hospital deaths. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:20–6. - PubMed
    1. Holcomb JB, Junco DJ del, Fox EE, Wade CE, Cohen MJ, Schreiber MA et al. The Prospective, Observational, Multicenter, Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) Study: Comparative Effectiveness of a Time-Varying Treatment With Competing Risks. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:127–36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cannon JW, Khan MA, Raja AS, Cohen MJ, Como JJ, Cotton BA, et al. Damage control resuscitation in patients with severe traumatic hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82:605–17. - PubMed
    1. Lammers DT, Holcomb JB. Damage control resuscitation in adult trauma patients: what you need to know. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95:464–71. - PubMed
    1. Hedley-Whyte J, Milamed DR. Blood and war. Ulst Méd J. 2010;79:125–34. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data