Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 16;272(5):341.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13059-3.

Patient journey and decision processes for anti-amyloid therapy in Alzheimer's disease

Affiliations

Patient journey and decision processes for anti-amyloid therapy in Alzheimer's disease

Brant Mittler et al. J Neurol. .

Abstract

Introduction: We utilized the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System administrative database to study the clinical decision-making processes for anti-amyloid therapy (AAT).

Methods: Patients with clinical notes mentioning lecanemab were identified (March 2023-June 2024) for manual review and structured database queries.

Results: From an initial sample (N = 2499), 1064 patients (55,000 notes) were reviewed manually (mean age 76 years; 7.3% women; 9.2% Black; 3.9% Hispanic). The AAT group (n = 56) had lower rates of common comorbidities, except post-traumatic stress disorder, than patients excluded from AAT (n = 528). The documented notes including "Lack of patient interest/resource constraints" (24.6% vs 3.6%), "anticoagulant use" (23.1% vs 10.7%), and "advanced AD" (18.6% vs 0), supplied partial explanations on exclusion vs inclusion.

Discussion: Only 5.3% of patients reached the point of care of being a candidate, scheduled for, or receiving AAT infusion. Patient preference and clinician discretion, especially regarding modifiable factors (e.g., medication regimens), appreciably influence the patient journey to AAT.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Anti-amyloid therapy; Electronic health records; Lecanemab; Mild cognitive impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflicts of interest: Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Michael Irizzary, and Quanwu Zhang are employees of Eisai Inc. The other authors declare no conflict of interest. Informed consent: All clinical notes from the nationwide VAHS database electronic health records (EHR) were searched, and the study was approved by the Bedford VA Healthcare System Institutional Review Board (IRB). Consent was not required for database analysis.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Categorization by the latest step in patient journey with AAT. a1019 patients were randomly selected from the initial sample of 2499 patients with notes referencing AAT; any women who had not been selected (n = 45) were added to enrich their representation to produce a final sample of 1064 patients

References

    1. Guerreiro R, Bras J (2015) The age factor in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med 7:106. 10.1186/s13073-015-0232-5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qiu C, Kivipelto M, von Strauss E (2009) Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: occurrence, determinants, and strategies toward intervention. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 11:111–128. 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/cqiu - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casey DA, Antimisiaris D, O’Brien J (2010) Drugs for Alzheimer’s disease: are they effective? P T 35:208–211 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration (2021) FDA grants accelerated approval for Alzheimer’s drug. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-grants-accelerat..., Accessed on March 26, 2024
    1. Food and Drug Administration (2023) FDA grants accelerated approval for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-grants-accelerat..., Accessed on March 26, 2024