Comparative Effectiveness of Bile Acid Sequestrants and Antibiotics in the Management of Acute Pouchitis: A Matched Cohort Study from the United States
- PMID: 40237906
- DOI: 10.1007/s10620-025-09039-2
Comparative Effectiveness of Bile Acid Sequestrants and Antibiotics in the Management of Acute Pouchitis: A Matched Cohort Study from the United States
Abstract
Background and aims: Bile acid sequestrants (BAS) are an emerging option for treatment of pouchitis. We aimed to compare BAS monotherapy, antibiotics, and combination therapy with both in the treatment of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the US-Collaborative TriNetX database to identify patients with acute pouchitis and UC. Treatment groups were divided into BAS (cholestyramine, colesevelam, colestipol), antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and/or metronidazole), and combination therapy of both BAS and antibiotics. Primary outcomes were failure of initial therapy (early relapse or nonresponse) and the development of recurrent pouchitis in the first 12 months after an initial episode of pouchitis.
Results: Our analysis included 1,136 patients (mean age: 37.8 ± 15.4 years, and 45.9% female) of whom 727 (64%) were diagnosed with recurrent pouchitis. After adjusting for confounders by propensity-score matching, there was no significant difference in the odds of early relapse or nonresponse with BAS compared with antibiotic monotherapy (aOR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.40-1.38; p = 0.34) or combination therapy (aOR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.47-1.88; p = 0.86). Patients treated with BAS had a statistically significant lower recurrent pouchitis rate (aHR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.42-0.79; p < 0.001) compared with patients treated with antibiotics. Patients treated with BAS had a statistically significant longer time (median: 225 days) to recurrent pouchitis (p < 0.001) compared to antibiotics (median: 99 days).
Conclusion: Using real-world evidence regarding treatment of pouchitis compared to standard antibiotic therapy, BAS monotherapy was not inferior for initial treatment response and significantly prolonged time to recurrent pouchitis.
Keywords: IPAA; Propensity-score matching; Ulcerative colitis.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no competing interests. FAF: Astellas, Avalo Therapeutics, BMS, Braintree Labs, Fresenius Kabi, GI Reviewers, GSK, IBD Educational Group, Iterative Health, Janssen, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, Sandoz Immunology, Sebela, and Viatris. DSMB: Lilly. JGH: Advisory Board for BMS. Other authors have no financial disclosures.
References
-
- Shen B. Pouchitis: pathophysiology and management. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2024;21:463–476.
-
- Sriranganathan D, Kilic Y, Nabil Quraishi M, Segal JP. Prevalence of pouchitis in both ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24:27–39. - PubMed
-
- Barnes EL, Agrawal M, Syal G, Ananthakrishnan AN, Cohen BL, Haydek JP et al. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Pouchitis and Inflammatory Pouch Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2024;166:59–85. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
