Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jun 1;82(6):563-571.
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0482.

Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Mental Disorders in Adults: A Unified Series of Meta-Analyses

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Mental Disorders in Adults: A Unified Series of Meta-Analyses

Pim Cuijpers et al. JAMA Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Importance: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is a first-line treatment for most mental disorders. However, no meta-analytic study has yet integrated the results of randomized clinical trials on CBT across different disorders, using uniform methodologies and providing a complete overview of the field.

Objective: To examine the effect sizes of CBT for 4 anxiety disorders, 2 eating disorders, major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and psychotic and bipolar disorders on symptoms of the respective disorders using uniform methodologies for data extraction, risk of bias (RoB) assessment, and meta-analytic techniques.

Data sources: Major bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase for all disorders) were searched up to January 1, 2024, for each disorder separately. Data analysis was performed from August 2024 to January 2025.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials comparing CBT with inactive control conditions in adults with 1 of the mental disorders established through a clinical interview were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: Basic characteristics of patients, CBT, and studies were extracted. RoB was assessed with the Cochrane RoB tool 2. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the standardized mean difference (Hedges g) indicating the difference between CBT and controls at posttreatment on symptoms of the respective disorders.

Results: A total of 375 trials (423 comparisons) between CBT and controls were included among 32 968 patients. The overall mean (SD) patient age was 43.4 (13.7) years, and the mean (SD) proportion of women was 0.68 (0.24). Effect sizes for CBT compared to all control conditions (g) were lower than 0.5 for bipolar and psychotic disorder; between 0.5 and 1.0 for panic, social anxiety, and generalized anxiety disorders, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorders, depression, and OCD; and larger than 1.0 for PTSD and specific phobias (range of effect sizes: 0.31 for bipolar disorder to 1.27 for PTSD). Large effect sizes (g > 0.94) were observed in waitlist-controlled trials, a control condition mostly used in anxiety and eating disorders, PTSD, and OCD. Trials using care as usual showed more modest effect sizes (0.22-1.13). Study dropout rates within the CBT conditions ranged from 8% for specific phobia to 24% for PTSD.

Conclusions and relevance: In this unified series of meta-analyses, CBT was probably effective in the treatment of mental disorders, including major depression, anxiety disorders, PTSD, OCD, and eating disorders, and possibly effective in psychotic and bipolar disorders. However, the effect sizes depended on the type of control condition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Harrer reported being a part-time employee of Get.On Institut für Gesundheitstrainings GmbH/HelloBetter, a company that provides digital therapeutics for mental health problems in routine care. Dr Papola reported grants from the European Union Horizon research program (Horizon-MSCA-2021-PF-01) under agreement N 101061648 outside the submitted work. Dr Driessen reported grants from the American Psychoanalytic Association and the Dutch Psychoanalytic Funds outside the submitted work. Dr Franco reported a PhD scholarship from the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (Chile) and postdoctoral funding from the Instituto de Investigación en Depresión y Personalidad MIDAP, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, outside the submitted work. Dr Schnurr reported grants from Healing Breakthrough outside the submitted work. Dr Furukawa reported personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, DT Axis, Micron Technology, Shionogi, SONY, and UpToDate; grants from DT Axis and Shionogi outside the submitted work; and a patent issued (7448125), a patent pending (2022-082495), and a patent for intellectual properties for Kokoro-app licensed to Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. Beck AT. Cognitive therapy: nature and relation to behavior therapy - republished article. Behav Ther. 2016;47(6):776-784. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis A. Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy. Lyle Stuart; 1962.
    1. Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res. 2012;36(5):427-440. doi:10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(1):17-31. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leichsenring F, Steinert C, Rabung S, Ioannidis JPA. The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses. World Psychiatry. 2022;21(1):133-145. doi:10.1002/wps.20941 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms