Outcomes of bispecific antibody therapy after CAR T-cell failure in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma
- PMID: 40238938
- PMCID: PMC12337189
- DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015719
Outcomes of bispecific antibody therapy after CAR T-cell failure in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma
Abstract
Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who experience relapsed disease after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy have a poor prognosis. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) induce complete remissions in ∼35% of these cases. Hypothesizing overlapping LBCL-intrinsic resistance mechanisms as well as common poor prognosis predictors to CAR-T and BsAb therapy, we conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis including 92 patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) LBCL treated with BsAbs after CAR-T failure. Overall response rate (ORR) was 43%, with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.8 months. Patients receiving BsAbs during early relapse (≤3 months) achieved a significantly worse outcome (ORR, 29%; PFS, 2.2 months) compared with patients with an intermediate (4-6 months; ORR, 54%; PFS, 3.7 months) or a late relapse (>6 months; ORR, 60%; PFS, 10.5 months). The benefit of later relapse was particularly notable in patients receiving BsAbs as first salvage therapy compared with those receiving a BsAb in subsequent lines (PFS not reached vs 2.7 months; overall survival not reached vs 9.1 months, respectively). In addition to early R/R state before BsAbs, elevated lactate dehydrogenase and higher International Prognostic Index score were significant predictors of poor outcomes to BsAb in multivariate Cox regression analyses. The finding that patients with early relapse after CAR-T respond particularly poorly to BsAb highlights the necessity for alternative treatment options in this high-risk patient cohort.
© 2025 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: E.S. received honoraria (not related to this study) from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Sanofi, Oncopeptides, Gilead, Incyte, Eli Lilly, and Takeda. B.C. is inventor on patent applications related to molecular subtyping of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, including DLBclass; has received research funding from Gilead in 2021, not related to this study; served on advisory boards (not related to this study) for AbbVie, ADC, BMS, Incyte, Janssen, Regeneron, Roche, and Sobi; received honoraria for talks from AbbVie, Ars Tempi, AstraZeneca, BMS, Incyte, Janssen, Gilead, KML, Roche, Sandoz, Sobi, and Ono Pharmaceutical (not related to this study); received travel support from Sobi and Roche (not related to this study); and is lead investigator on the R-Pola-Glo clinical trial, which is indirectly funded by Roche. M.H. received travel support from AbbVie and served on advisory boards (unrelated to this study) for Sobi, Novartis, Gilead, BMS, Pfizer, Incyte, Sanofi, Roche, Janssen, and Amgen. U.H. has served on advisory boards (not related to this study) for BMS, Johnson & Johnson, Kite Pharma (a Gilead company), and Roche, and received honoraria (unrelated to this study) for talks from AbbVie, BeiGene, BMS, Johnson & Johnson, Kite Pharma (a Gilead company), and Miltenyi Biotec. T.M. received honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Incyte, Janssen, Regeneron, and Roche, not related to this study. B.v.T. is an adviser or consultant (unrelated to this study) for Allogene, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Cerus, Kite Pharma (a Gilead company), Incyte, IQVIA, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, Noscendo, Pentixapharm, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, QualWorld, Regeneron, Roche, Sobi, and Takeda; has received honoraria (not related to this study) from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS/Celgene, Kite Pharma (a Gilead company), Incyte, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche Pharma AG, and Takeda; reports research funding (unrelated to this study) from Esteve (institutional), Merck Sharp & Dohme (institutional), Novartis (institutional), and Takeda (institutional); and reports travel support (not related to this study) from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Kite Pharma (a Gilead company), Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Takeda, and Novartis. V.V. received honoraria for consultancy or advisory roles from AbbVie, Novartis, Gilead, BMS, Janssen, Sobi, Incyte, AstraZeneca, Amgen, and MSD, unrelated to this study G.L. received research grants (not related to this study) from Agios, Aquinox, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, MorphoSys, Novartis, Roche, and Verastem Oncology, and received honoraria (not related to this study) from ADC Therapeutics, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Constellation, Genase, Genmab, Gilead, Hexal-Sandoz, Inmagene, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Eli Lilly, Miltenyi Biotec, MorphoSys, NanoString, Novartis, Pentixapharm, Roche, Sobi, and Takeda. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.
Figures





References
-
- Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Arnason JE, et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and secondary CNS lymphoma: initial results from TRANSCEND NHL 001. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(suppl 15):7515.
-
- Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. All ZUMA-7 Investigators and Contributing Kite Members Axicabtagene ciloleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(7):640–654. - PubMed
-
- Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. JULIET Investigators Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):45–56. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources