Early Ezetimibe Initiation After Myocardial Infarction Protects Against Later Cardiovascular Outcomes in the SWEDEHEART Registry
- PMID: 40240093
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.02.007
Early Ezetimibe Initiation After Myocardial Infarction Protects Against Later Cardiovascular Outcomes in the SWEDEHEART Registry
Abstract
Background: Combination lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) after myocardial infarction (MI) achieves lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and better cardiovascular outcomes vs statin monotherapy. As a result, global guidelines recommend lower LDL-C but, paradoxically, advise treatment through a stepwise approach. Yet the need for combination therapy is inevitable as <20% of patients achieve goals with statins alone. Whether combining ezetimibe with a statin early vs late after MI results in better outcomes is unknown.
Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to assess the impact of delayed treatment escalation on outcomes by comparing early vs late oral combination LLT (statins plus ezetimibe) in patients with MI.
Methods: LLT-naïve patients (SWEDEHEART registry) hospitalized for MI (2015-2022) and discharged on statins were included. Using clone-censor-weight and Cox proportional hazards models, we compared differences in risks of MACE (death, MI, stroke), components of MACE, and cardiovascular death between patients with ezetimibe added to statins ≤12 weeks after discharge as reference (early combination therapy), from 13 weeks to 16 months (late combination therapy), or not at all.
Results: Of 35,826 patients (median age 65.1 years, 26.0% women), 6,040 (16.9%) received ezetimibe early, 6,495 (18.1%) ezetimibe late, and 23,291 (65.0%) received no ezetimibe. High-intensity statin use was ≥98% in all groups. Over a median 3.96 years (Q1-Q3: 2.15-5.81 years), 2,570 patients had MACE (440 cardiovascular deaths). One-year MACE incidences were 1.79 (early), 2.58 (late), and 4.03 (none) per 100 patient-years. Compared with early combination therapy, weighted risk differences in MACE for late combination therapy at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.6% (95% CI: 0.1%-1.1%; P < 0.01), 1.1% (95% CI: 0.3%-2.0%; P < 0.01), and 0.7% (95% CI: -0.2% to 1.3%; P = 0.18), and 3-year HR was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.95-1.41). For those receiving no ezetimibe, risk differences were 0.7% (95% CI: 0.2%-1.3%), 1.6% (95% CI: 0.8%-2.5%), and 1.9% (95% CI: 0.8%-3.1%; P for all <0.01; 3-year HR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.12-1.55]). Similar differences in risk of cardiovascular death at 3 years were observed (HRs vs early: late: 1.64 [95% CI: 1.15-2.63]; none: 1.83 [95% CI: 1.35-2.69]).
Conclusions: MI care pathways should implement early combination therapy with statins and ezetimibe as standard care, because delaying use of combination LLT or using high-intensity statin monotherapy is associated with avoidable harm.
Keywords: combination therapy; ezetimibe; lipid-lowering therapy; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; myocardial infarction; statin.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was funded by Skåne and Uppsala Regions, Sweden, and the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (20190390). Dr Leosdottir has received institutional grants and honoraria from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bonnier Health Care, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Dr Schubert has received institutional grants and honoraria from Amgen, Pfizer, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Dr Brandts has received institutional grants and honoraria from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Lily, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Dr Gustafsson is employed by Sence Research, an independent company in epidemiology and biostatistics at which the statistical analyses within this research project were conducted. Dr Cars is employed by and has co-ownership in Sence Research. Dr Sundström has co-ownership and stock in Sence Research. Dr Jernberg has received grants from MSD; and has received a consulting fee from Amgen to his institution. Dr Ray has received institutional grants from Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sanofi, and Ultragenix; and has received consultancy fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Pfizer, Viatris, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Kowa Pharmaceutics, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Esperion, Cargene Therapeutics, Resverlogix, Novartis, Silence Therapeutics, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Scribe Therapeutics, CRISPR Therapeutics, Vaxxinity, Amarin, CSL Behring, Bayer, Cleerly Health, Emendobio and Stock Options PEMI31, New Amsterdam Pharma, and SCRIBE, outside the submitted work. Dr Hagström has received institutional grants and honoraria from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
