Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70372.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.70372.

Chronic Wounds and Employment: Assessing Occupation-Related Burden of Patients With Chronic Wounds-Results of a Pilot Study

Dorothee Ann-Kathrin Busch  1   2 , Nicole Methner  3 , Delara Azodanlou  1 , Maurice Moelleken  4 , Joachim Dissemond  4 , Ursula Hertha Hübner  3 , Mareike Przysucha  3 , Florian Kücking  3 , Carola Berking  1 , Cornelia Erfurt-Berge  1
Affiliations

Chronic Wounds and Employment: Assessing Occupation-Related Burden of Patients With Chronic Wounds-Results of a Pilot Study

Dorothee Ann-Kathrin Busch et al. Int Wound J. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Chronic wounds can impact the quality of life of working-age individuals. However, the specific challenges and burdens these patients face in the workplace remain understudied. This study aimed to 1) investigate how chronic wounds affect work life and 2) develop a screening tool for identifying highly affected patients. In total, 51 patients with chronic wounds answered a questionnaire on demographics, employment status, wound-related limitations, workplace conditions, social welfare use and subjective burden of disease. To assess the subjective burden, we developed a specific research tool on employment and chronic wounds (REACH Score) to measure and quantify the impact of the chronic wound on working patients. The patients, who answered the questionnaire, were employed (78%), on sick leave (18%) or retired (4%). They spent an average of 5.3 h per week on wound-related activities. Regarding workplace stressors, we found that taking breaks when needed was correlated with less time off sick and better work-related quality of life. Patients reported career concerns and reduced productivity. The REACH score was significantly correlated with sick leave, work difficulties, time consumed by the wound and overall quality of life. According to our pilot-study, the impact of chronic wounds on patients of working age is most evident in the form of sick leave and reduced work performance and in a reduced quality of life. It is crucial to identify the key factors contributing to stress in the work environment in a larger sample in order to improve the working conditions of patients and detrimental socioeconomic effects on the workforce. The REACH score is a novel tool to screen employed patients with chronic wounds for reduced work capacity and quality of life.

Keywords: chronic wounds; employment; quality of life; work; wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Distribution of the REACH Score.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Distribution of the VAS Score.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Sen C. K., “Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2022 Compendium of Estimates,” Advances in Wound Care 12 (2023): 657–670. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Platsidaki E., Kouris A., and Christodoulou C., “Psychosocial Aspects in Patients With Chronic Leg Ulcers,” Wounds: a Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice 29 (2017): 306–310. - PubMed
    1. Olsson M., Järbrink K., Divakar U., et al., “The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review,” Wound Repair and Regeneration 27 (2019): 114–125, 10.1111/wrr.12683. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sen C. K., “Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2020 Compendium of Estimates,” Advances in Wound Care 10 (2021): 281–292. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown A., “Chronic Leg Ulcers, Part 2: Do They Affect a patient's Social Life?,” British Journal of Nursing 14 (2005): 986–989. - PubMed