Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 May 6;14(9):e038651.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038651. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

Impact of Elevated Troponin Level at the Time of Sepsis Recognition on the Clinical Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Impact of Elevated Troponin Level at the Time of Sepsis Recognition on the Clinical Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Eun-Jeong Choi et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction, known as septic cardiomyopathy, is a common complication associated with increased mortality. Cardiac troponins serve as markers for myocardial injury and are frequently elevated in patients with sepsis. However, the role of troponin elevation at sepsis recognition in risk stratification remains controversial.

Methods and results: This nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study analyzed 2141 adult patients with sepsis without prior cardiovascular disease from the Korean Sepsis Alliance registry. These patients were classified as having either elevated troponin levels or troponin levels in the normal range at the time of sepsis recognition, according to the reference ranges specific to each participating institution. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, and propensity score matching was used to control for confounding factors. In the propensity score-matched cohort (523 pairs), there were no significant differences in hospital mortality (35.2% versus 32.7%, odds ratio [OR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.86-1.44], P=0.396), hospital length of stay (13.0 versus 15.0 days, OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.00], P=0.128), intensive care unit mortality (24.7% versus 25.0%, OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.74-1.30], P=0.886), or intensive care unit length of stay between the elevated troponin and control groups. However, landmark analysis revealed that the elevated troponin group had a lower survival probability after 1 week (log-rank P=0.033) and significantly higher kidney Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores from intensive care unit admission to day 7 (P=0.003).

Conclusions: Troponin elevation at sepsis recognition was not significantly associated with increased hospital mortality or worse clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.

Keywords: mortality; sepsis; shock; troponin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Scheme of patient selection and group distribution.
ED indicates emergency department; and ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curve for sepsis patients stratified by cardiac troponin or not.
Blue line=elevated group, red line=control group.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score changes from intensive care unit admission to day 7.
A, Total SOFA, P=0.500, (B) Respiratory SOFA, P=0.510, (C) Coagulation SOFA, P=0.981, (D) Liver SOFA, P=0.760, (E) Cardiovascular SOFA, P=0.750, (F) Central nervous system SOFA, P=0.354, (G) Renal SOFA, P=0.032. Blue line=elevated group, red line=control group. CNS indicates central nervous system; CV, cardiovascular; SMD, standardized mean difference; and SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Comment in

  • Troponin's Twist: A Sepsis Story Beyond the Heart.
    Elliott A, Alhuneafat L, Bartos JA. Elliott A, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e041428. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.041428. Epub 2025 Apr 16. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025. PMID: 40240917 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar‐Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis‐3). J Am Med Assoc. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T, Preissing F, Stiefel J, Adam D. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019‐ results from a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Crit Care. 2020;24:239. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02950-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Machado FR, Cavalcanti AB, Bozza FA, Ferreira EM, Angotti Carrara FS, Sousa JL, Caixeta N, Salomao R, Angus DC, Pontes Azevedo LC, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in Brazilian intensive care units (the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database, SPREAD): an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:1180–1189. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30322-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Price S, Anning PB, Mitchell JA, Evans TW. Myocardial dysfunction in sepsis: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:715–724. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1998.1358 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blixt PJ, Nguyen M, Cholley B, Hammarskjold F, Toiron A, Bouhemad B, Lee S, De Geer L, Andersson H, Aneq MA, et al. Association between left ventricular systolic function parameters and myocardial injury, organ failure and mortality in patients with septic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2024;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01235-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources