Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Aug;12(4):2855-2865.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15295. Epub 2025 Apr 17.

Plasma volume status predicting clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Plasma volume status predicting clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Ai Kagase et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: Plasma volume status (PVS) is recognized as a marker of systemic congestion, but its clinical utility in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has not been well established. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of PVS in these patients.

Methods and results: Data from 3763 patients who underwent M-TEER were analysed from a Japanese multicentre registry. Patients were classified into functional MR (FMR) and degenerative MR (DMR) according to MR aetiology, and the median PVS values for each were calculated (FMR 12.7, DMR 14.4). The median value was used as the cut-off, stratifying the cohort into a high PVS group (n = 1882) and a low PVS group (n = 1881). All-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization between these two groups were compared up to 3 years in the overall, FMR, and DMR populations. The cumulative incidence rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization were higher in the high PVS group than in the low PVS group (47.0% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001, 31.6% vs. 13.6%, P < 0.001, and 35.9% vs. 24.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). Similar trends in terms of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization were observed in the FMR and DMR cohorts (all P < 0.05). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the high PVS compared with the low PVS group was independently associated with the increased risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001), cardiovascular death (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03, P < 0.001) and HF hospitalization (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02, P < 0.001). An independent association between a high PVS and all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization was also found in FMR and DMR sub-groups (all P < 0.05) while reducing MR severity to moderate or less after M-TEER was associated with improved outcomes in both the high and low PVS groups.

Conclusions: Preoperative PVS is a strong independent prognostic marker in patients undergoing M-TEER, correlating with increased risk of mortality and HF hospitalization. PVS may provide valuable clinical insights for patient stratification and management strategies in M-TEER patients.

Keywords: Heart failure; Mitral regurgitation; Plasma volume status; Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs Yamamoto, Kagase, Kubo, Saji, Izumi, Asami, Izumo, Watanabe, Ohno, Hachinohe, Enta, Shirai, Mizuno, Boda, Kodama, Amaki, and Hayashida are clinical proctors of transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair for Abbott Medical and have received lecture/consultant fees from Abbott Medical. Dr J. Yamaguchi is a clinical proctor of transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair for Abbott Medical and has received a lecture fee and a scholarship donation from Abbott Medical. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Flowchart of the study design with patient distribution. (B) Distribution of plasma volume status (PVS) in the OCEAN‐Mitral registry cohort was divided into functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). (C) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and heart failure hospitalization in patients with PVS stratified based on quartiles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curves showing the study endpoints in the plasma volume status (PVS) groups defined by two differential PVS classifications in functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) cohorts. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative all‐cause death in PVS stratified based on quartiles in the FMR cohort. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative cardiovascular death in PVS stratified based on quartiles in the FMR cohort. (C) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative heart failure (HF) hospitalization in PVS stratified based on quartiles in the FMR cohort. (D) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative all‐cause death in PVS stratified based on quartiles in the DMR cohort. (E) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative cardiovascular death in PVS stratified based on quartiles in the DMR cohort. (F) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative HF hospitalization in PVS stratified based on quartiles in the DMR cohort.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of multivariate Cox regression analysis in terms of all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and heart failure (HF) hospitalization by overall, functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) cohorts.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier curves of all‐cause death showing in the plasma volume status (PVS) groups defined by two differential PVS classifications in clinical variables. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative all‐cause death in postprocedural residual mitral regurgitation (MR) ≥ +2 stratified based on quartiles in the high and low PVS cohort. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative all‐cause death in following preoperative number of medications. (C) Kaplan–Meier curves showing cumulative all‐cause death in preoperative diuretics stratified based on quartiles in the high and low PVS cohort.

References

    1. Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, Kar S, Rinaldi MJ, Fail PS, et al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1395‐1406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009355 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S, Smart SC, Trento A, Siegel RJ, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous repair and surgery for mitral regurgitation: 5‐year results of EVEREST II. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2844‐2854. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stone GW, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Kar S, Lim DS, Mishell JM, et al. Transcatheter mitral‐valve repair in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2307‐2318. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806640 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anker SD, Friede T, von Bardeleben RS, Butler J, Khan MS, Diek M, et al. Transcatheter valve repair in heart failure with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2024;391:1799‐1809. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2314328 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kubo S, Yamamoto M, Saji M, Asami M, Enta Y, Nakashima M, et al. One‐year outcomes and their relationship to residual mitral regurgitation after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair with MitraClip device: insights from the OCEAN‐Mitral registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2023;12:e030747. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030747 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources