Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 1;73(7):946-952.
doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2280_24. Epub 2025 Apr 17.

Current perspectives on infections following refractive kerato-lenticule extraction (KLex) surgery

Affiliations
Review

Current perspectives on infections following refractive kerato-lenticule extraction (KLex) surgery

Venugopal Anitha et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Refractive kerato-lenticule extraction surgery (KLex), also known as "small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)," or "smooth incision keratomileusis" (SILK), represents a significant advancement in refractive surgery with its minimally invasive approach and impressive success rates. Despite these advancements, postoperative infectious keratitis, though rare, poses a critical challenge and profoundly impacts visual outcomes. Unlike infections following surface ablation procedures, which benefit from direct drug penetration into the site of infection, KLex and LASIK face hurdles due to the depth of infection location. In laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), infections begin at the interface between the flap and the stromal bed, whereas in KLex, they occur within the stromal bed. This position of the infiltrate poses the challenge of inadequate drug penetration, making management more complex. This review explores the nuances of post-KLex infectious keratitis, delving into the incidence, predisposing factors, and pathophysiology. It also covers the common organisms causing the infection, clinical manifestations, and management strategies. By offering a comprehensive guide, this paper aims to furnish clinicians with the knowledge necessary for vigilant monitoring and timely intervention, thereby enhancing patient outcomes following KLex procedures.

Keywords: Infectious keratitis; refractive kerato-lenticule extraction surgery; refractive surgery complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Shows the inferior infiltrate on the tenth postoperative day post-Klex. (b) shows the magnified view of the inferior infiltrate
Figure 2
Figure 2
Shows the healed infiltrate with scarring
Figure 3
Figure 3
Shows the current scenario in the management of SMILE infections

References

    1. Eldaly ZH, Abdelsalam MA, Hussein MS, Nassr MA. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flap morphology and predictability by wavelight fs200 femtosecond laser and moria microkeratome: An anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2019;33:113–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C, Gille A, Bissmann W, Stobrawa G, et al. First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: Six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1513–20. - PubMed
    1. He S, Luo Y, Ye Y, Chen P, Liu C, Lei L, et al. A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10:730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vingopoulos F, Zisimopoulos A, Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of effective corneal refractive centration to the visual axis: LASIK vs SMILE, a contralateral eye digitized comparison of the postoperative result. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47:1511–8. - PubMed
    1. Han T, Zhao L, Shen Y, Chen Z, Yang D, Zhang J, et al. Twelve-year global publications on small incision lenticule extraction: A bibliometric analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:990657. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources