Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 1;157(4):2905-2920.
doi: 10.1121/10.0036440.

Cochlear-implant dichotic listening performance and effort are disrupted with functional ear asymmetry

Affiliations

Cochlear-implant dichotic listening performance and effort are disrupted with functional ear asymmetry

Kristina DeRoy Milvae et al. J Acoust Soc Am. .

Abstract

When speech understanding abilities differ across the ears, auditory attention and listening effort could be impacted. Twenty listeners with bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) completed this experiment. Fourteen listeners had symmetric and six listeners had asymmetric functional hearing. Listeners completed monotic and dichotic digit recall with digit string lengths of four and six digits and attention directed to each ear. Pupil size was monitored as an index of listening effort. Individual differences in working memory and inhibition abilities were measured. It was hypothesized that ear asymmetry would lead to poorer listening performance and higher listening effort, and that cognitive abilities would predict both performance and listening effort. Greater differences in performance across ears were observed with asymmetry. Lower listening effort was observed with asymmetry, regardless of which ear was attended. Poorer working memory abilities predicted higher listening effort. These results suggest that asymmetric listeners may experience reduced perception of a poorer ear, and that individuals with poorer working memory abilities are at risk to experience higher listening effort in complex listening environments with CIs. More broadly, these results suggest that the salience of sensory inputs contributes to auditory attention ability and use of cognitive resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abramowitz, J. C., Goupell, M. J., and DeRoy Milvae, K. (2024). “Cochlear–implant simulated signal degradation exacerbates listening effort in older listeners,” Ear Hear. 45, 441–450.10.1097/AUD.0000000000001440 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahern, S., and Beatty, J. (1979). “Pupillary responses during information processing vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test scores,” Science 205, 1289–1292.10.1126/science.472746 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akeroyd, M. A. (2008). “Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults,” Int. J. Audiol. 47, S53–S71.10.1080/14992020802301142 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakal, T. A., DeRoy Milvae, K., Chen, C., and Goupell, M. J. (2021). “Head shadow, summation, and squelch in bilateral cochlear-implant users with linked automatic gain controls,” Trends Hear. 25, 1–17.10.1177/23312165211018147 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., and Tily, H. J. (2013). “Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal,” J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255–278.10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources