Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 21;26(7):2830.
doi: 10.3390/ijms26072830.

Functional Characterization of miR-216a-5p and miR-125a-5p on Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells

Affiliations

Functional Characterization of miR-216a-5p and miR-125a-5p on Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells

Grazia Fenu et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Its poor prognosis is closely related to late-stage diagnosis, which results from both nonspecific symptoms and the absence of biomarkers for early diagnosis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) exert a regulatory role in numerous biological processes and their aberrant expression has been found in a broad spectrum of diseases, including cancer. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a driving force for PDAC initiation, progression, and metastatic spread. Our previous research highlighted the interesting behavior of miR-216a-5p and miR-125a-5p related to PDAC progression and the CSC phenotype. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of miR-216a-5p and miR-125a-5p on the acquisition or suppression of pancreatic CSC traits. BxPC-3, AsPC-1 cell lines, and their CSC-like models were transfected with miR-216a-5p and miR-125a-5p mimics and inhibitors. Following transfection, we evaluated their impact on the expression of CSC surface markers (CD44/CD24/CxCR4), ALDH1 activity, pluripotency- and EMT-related gene expression, and clonogenic potential. Our results show that miR-216a-5p enhances the expression of CD44/CD24/CxCR4 while negatively affecting the activity of ALDH1 and the expression of EMT genes. MiR-216a-5p positively influenced the clonogenic property. MiR-125a-5p promoted the expression of CD44/CD24/CxCR4 while inhibiting ALDH1 activity. It enhanced the expression of Snail, Oct-4, and Sox-2, while the clonogenic potential appeared to be affected. Comprehensively, our results provide further knowledge on the role of miRNAs in pancreatic CSCs. Moreover, they corroborate our previous findings about miR-216a-5p's potential dual role and miR-125a-5p's promotive function in PDAC.

Keywords: CSC; PDAC; functional study; miR-125a-5p; miR-216a-5p; miRNA; miRNA regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of miR-216a-5p on CD44/CD24/CxCR4 expression in (a) adherent BxPC-3 and their CSC-like models; and (b) adherent AsPC-1 and their CSC-like models. Effect of miR-125a-5p on CD44/CD24/CxCR4 expression in (c) adherent BxPC-3 and their CSC-like models; and (d) adherent AsPC-1 and their CSC-like models. Values were normalized with the control cells in monolayer and in CSC enrichment. We attributed different p-values to the asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of miR-216a-5p on ALDH1 activity and representative flow cytometry cytogram plot of (a) adherent BxPC-3 and their CSC-like models; and (b) adherent AsPC-1 and their CSC-like models. Effect of miR-125a-5p on ALDH1 activity and representative flow cytometry cytogram plot in (c) adherent BxPC-3 and their CSC-like models; and (d) adherent AsPC-1 and their CSC-like models. x-axis: FSC-A/ALDH1, y-axis: SSC-A/side scatter. Red dots refer to the entire population while green dots are representatives of ALDH1+ population. Values were normalized with the control cells in monolayer and in CSC enrichment. We attributed different p-values to the asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pluripotency-related gene relative expression following miR-216a-5p mimic and inhibitor treatments on monolayer-grown BxPC-3 and their CSC-like models (a) and on monolayer-grown AsPC-1 and their CSC-like models (b). We attributed different p-values to the asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pluripotency-related gene relative expression following miR-125a-5p mimic and inhibitor treatments on monolayer-grown BxPC-3 and their CSC-like models (a) and on monolayer-grown AsPC-1 and their CSC-like models (b). We attributed different p-values to the asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
EMT-related gene expression following miR-216a-5p mimic and inhibitor transfection in (a) adherent BxPC-3 and CSC-like models and (b) in adherent AsPC-1 and their CSC-like models. We attributed different p-values to the asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
EMT-related gene expression following miR-125a-5p mimic and inhibitor transfection in (a) adherent BxPC-3 and CSC-like models and (b) AsPC-1 and CSC-like models. We attributed different p-values to the asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) Effect of miR-216a-5p on the number and size of BxPC-3 colonies; (b) representative images of untreated BxPC-3 and miR-216a-5p mimic-treated and miR-216a-5p inhibitor-treated BxPC-3 in the soft-agar colony formation assay; (c) effect of miR-216a-5p on the number and size of AsPC-1 colonies; (d) representative imagines of untreated AsPC-1 and miR-216a-5p mimic-treated and miR-216a-5p inhibitor-treated AsPC-1 in the soft-agar colony formation assay. We attributed different p-values to the asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Effect of miR-125a-5p on the number and size of BxPC-3 colonies; (b) representative images of untreated BxPC-3 and miR-125a-5p mimic-treated and miR-125a-5p inhibitor-treated BxPC-3 in the soft-agar colony formation assay; (c) effect of miR-125a-5p on the number and size of AsPC-1 colonies; (d) representative images of untreated AsPC-1 and miR-125a-5p mimic-treated and miR-125a-5p inhibitor-treated AsPC-1 in the soft-agar colony formation assay. We attributed different p-values to the asterisks: *** p < 0.001.

Similar articles

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Giaquinto A.N., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics. 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024;74:12–49. - PubMed
    1. Wood L.D., Canto M.I., Jaffee E.M., Simeone D.M. Pancreatic Cancer: Pathogenesis, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Gastroenterology. 2022;163:386–402.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ishiwata T., Matsuda Y., Yoshimura H., Sasaki N., Ishiwata S., Ishikawa N., Takubo K., Arai T., Aida J. Pancreatic cancer stem cells: Features and detection methods. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2018;24:797–805. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0420-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ansari D., Gustafsson A., Andersson R. Update on the management of pancreatic cancer: Surgery is not enough. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015;21:3157–3165. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3157. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang J., Lok V., Ngai C.H., Zhang L., Yuan J., Lao X.Q., Ng K., Chong C., Zheng Z.-J., Wong M.C. Worldwide Burden of, Risk Factors for, and Trends in Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:744–754. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.007. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms