Retention forces in mini-dental-implant retained mandibular overdentures: 10-year outcomes of a non-comparative longitudinal observational study
- PMID: 40244532
- PMCID: PMC12006574
- DOI: 10.1186/s40729-025-00620-y
Retention forces in mini-dental-implant retained mandibular overdentures: 10-year outcomes of a non-comparative longitudinal observational study
Abstract
Purpose: To report the evaluation of in vivo retention forces after replacement of O-rings in one-piece mini dental implants (MDIs), retaining mandibular implant overdentures (IODs) with ball/O-ring attachments during 10 years assessed.
Methods: Twenty patients received new complete dentures, which were converted into IODs through stabilization with four MDIs (Condent GmbH; diameter: 1.8 mm) placed in the interforaminal region. Retention forces were measured at the male and female parts at baseline, 5, and 10 years using a validated strain gauge. Fourteen patients completed the 10-year follow-up.
Results: After 10 years, a minor but significant reduction in retention force was observed in the male part of the implant at position 44. In contrast, neither the male part at the other implant positions nor the female part at any position showed a significant decrease in retention force compared to baseline. After replacement of the O-ring inserts, baseline values could be restored and no significant changes in retention forces were observed at the 10-year follow-up. No difference in anterior and posterior implants could be determined.
Conclusions: Initial retention forces of mandibular IODs supported by four MDIs can be reestablished by replacing the O-rings with pristine ones after 10 years, with stable retention forces at both the male and female parts throughout the functional period, with no discernible differences between anterior and posterior implants.
Keywords: Denture retention; Elderly patients; Mini dental implants; Narrow-diameter implants; Overdenture; Retention forces.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Evolution of in vivo assessed retention forces in one-piece mini dental implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 5-Year follow-up of a prospective clinical trial.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):968-976. doi: 10.1111/cid.12816. Epub 2019 Jul 16. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 31313455 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcomes and bone-level alterations around one-piece mini dental implants retaining mandibular overdentures: 5-year follow-up of a prospective cohort study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jun;31(6):549-556. doi: 10.1111/clr.13591. Epub 2020 Mar 9. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020. PMID: 32096255
-
Retention of Mandibular Complete Overdentures using Mini Dental Implants (Ø < 3 mm) and Standard Diameter Implants (Ø > 3mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 May 7;22:181-188. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5282167. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024. PMID: 38713458 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Clinical Study of Conventional Dental Implants and Mini Dental Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Apr;19(2):328-340. doi: 10.1111/cid.12461. Epub 2016 Nov 1. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 27804205 Clinical Trial.
-
O-Ring and Bar-Clip: A Comparative Analysis of Retention in Overdenture Prostheses - A Systematic Review.Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2024 Nov 29;32(4):415-422. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2727Araujo08. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2024. PMID: 39508621
Cited by
-
Biomechanics of different thread designs of dental implants assisting unilateral free end mandibular partial dentures.BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 28;25(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06255-0. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40437488 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(Suppl 1):108–25. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1108.x. - PubMed
-
- Thomason JM, Kelly SAM, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures - a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent. 2012;40(1):22–34. 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.017. - PubMed
-
- Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, Savard A, Feine JS. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(4):390–6. - PubMed
-
- Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(3):161–8. 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00029.x. - PubMed
-
- Abou-Ayash S, Fonseca M, Pieralli S, Reissmann DR. Treatment effect of implant-supported fixed complete dentures and implant overdentures on patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(S26):177–95. 10.1111/clr.14065. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources