Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 22;122(16):e2416697122.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416697122. Epub 2025 Apr 17.

Pulse timing dominates binaural hearing with cochlear implants

Affiliations

Pulse timing dominates binaural hearing with cochlear implants

Jan W H Schnupp et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Although cochlear implants (CIs) provide valuable auditory information to more than one million profoundly deaf patients, these devices remain inadequate in conveying fine timing cues. Early deaf patients in particular struggle to use interaural time differences (ITDs) for spatial hearing and auditory scene analysis. Why CI patients experience these limitations remains controversial. One possible explanation, which we investigate here, is that the stimulation by clinical CIs is inappropriate, as it encodes temporal features of sounds only in the envelope of electrical pulse trains, not the pulse timing. We have recently demonstrated that early deaf, adult implanted rats fitted with bilateral CIs that deliver carefully timed pulses routinely develop sensitivity to very small ITDs. Here we show that, while the early deafened mammalian auditory pathway can innately easily resolve pulse timing ITDs as small as 80 µs, it is many times less sensitive to the ITDs of pulse train envelopes. Our results indicate that the stimulation strategies in current clinical use do not present ITD cues in a manner that the inexperienced auditory pathway is highly sensitive to. This may deprive early deaf CI patients of the opportunity to hone their submillisecond temporal processing skills as they learn to hear through their prosthetic devices.

Keywords: cochlear implants; envelope; interaural time differences; pulse-timing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Hoesel R. J. M., Tyler R. S., Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 1617–1630 (2003). - PubMed
    1. Laback B., Pok S.-M., Baumgartner W.-D., Deutsch W. A., Schmid K., Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear 25, 488–500 (2004). - PubMed
    1. Majdak P., Laback B., Baumgartner W.-D., Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 2190–2201 (2006). - PubMed
    1. Kerber S., Seeber B. U., Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 33, 445–457 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noel V. A., Eddington D. K., Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 2314–2328 (2013). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources