Late gadolinium enhancement dispersion for predicting malignant arrhythmic events in patient with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
- PMID: 40244913
- DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf124
Late gadolinium enhancement dispersion for predicting malignant arrhythmic events in patient with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy
Abstract
Aims: Arrhythmic risk stratification in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains challenging. The LGE-dispersion mapping is a novel method for the quantification of tissue heterogeneity through the Global Dispersion Score (GDS). We sought to evaluate the usefulness of GDS in arrhythmic risk stratification of DCM patients.
Methods and results: Consecutive non-ischaemic DCM patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. GDS was calculated in LGE images. During a follow-up of 3.3 years (2 to 6 years), the combined endpoint of sudden cardiac death and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator intervention was considered. The final population included 510 patients (mean age was 56 ± 15 years). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was >35% in 241 patients (47%). LGE was present in 225 patients (45%). Median extent of LGE was 12% of LV mass [interquartile range (IQR) 6-20%]. Among patients with positive LGE, GDS was 0.14 (IQR 0.08-0.20). During follow-up 81 patients had malignant ventricular arrhythmias (8 SCD, 73 appropriate ICD interventions). At Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with GDS > 0.10 had worse prognosis than those with lower values of GDS (P < 0.0001). At multivariate analysis, GDS > 0.10 (HR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.7-5, P = 0.0002) was an independent predictor of events. The prognostic value of GDS was confirmed in subgroups of patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and >35%.
Conclusion: GDS is a useful marker to identify DCM patients at higher risk for malignant arrhythmic events regardless of LVEF and extent of LGE.
Keywords: cardiac magnetic resonance; dilated cardiomyopathy; late gadolinium enhancement; ventricular arrhythmias.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: None declared.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
 
        