Rationale and design of the anticoagulant therapy after left atrial appendage closure (ATLAAC) trial
- PMID: 40246048
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.04.015
Rationale and design of the anticoagulant therapy after left atrial appendage closure (ATLAAC) trial
Abstract
Introduction: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has become a recommended addition to oral anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation, who undergo cardiac surgery. The procedure significantly reduces the risk of stroke and systemic arterial embolism, potentially making oral anticoagulation (OAC) unnecessary or even harmful, when considering the associated increased risk of bleeding. This publication describes the rationale and design of a randomized trial, testing the hypothesis that stopping OAC is noninferior to continuing OAC after surgical LAAC in terms of the primary endpoint.
Methods: The ATLAAC trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, aiming to enroll 1,220 patients with atrial fibrillation, who have undergone surgical LAAC and remain on OAC. A cardiac CT scan is performed to confirm success of the LAAC. Patients with successful closure are randomized to stop or continue OAC. The primary endpoint is the first occurrence of ischemic stroke, systemic arterial embolism, or major bleeding over an expected mean follow-up of 4 years. Secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, any bleeding leading to hospitalization, blood transfusion, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and quality of life measures.
Trial status: Enrollment for the ATLAAC trial began in March 2024. As of January 18th, 2025, 554 patients have been enrolled in the study and 319 patients have been randomized. Recruitment is expected to continue for approximately 12 months. Follow-up will be stopped once 128 primary endpoints have occurred.
Conclusions: The ATLAAC trial will evaluate the safety of stopping OAC after surgical LAAC.
Trial registration number: EU-CT: 2022-502986-92-00, clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT06401616.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Lars Peter Schoedt Riber reports financial support was provided by Independent Research Fund Denmark. Lars Peter Schoedt Riber reports financial support was provided by AtriCure Inc. Kristina Gosvig reports financial support was provided by A.P. Moller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Moller Foundation. Axel Brandes reports a relationship with Bristol-Myers Squibb that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Axel Brandes reports a relationship with Theravance Biopharma Inc that includes: funding grants. Ivy Modrau reports a relationship with Novo Nordic Foundation that includes: funding grants. Richard Paul Whitlock reports a relationship with AtriCure Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Richard Paul Whitlock reports a relationship with Boston Scientific Corporation that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Richard Paul Whitlock reports a relationship with Abbott that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Emilie Belley-Cote reports a relationship with Abbott that includes: funding grants. Emilie Belley-Cote reports a relationship with Roche Diagnostics that includes: funding grants. Emilie Belley-Cote reports a relationship with Bayer that includes: funding grants. Emilie Belley-Cote reports a relationship with BMS-Pfizer that includes: funding grants. Emilie Belley-Cote reports a relationship with Trimedic Therapeutics that includes: consulting or advisory. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials