Phenotypic comparison between combined dystonia-parkinsonism and idiopathic adult-onset dystonia
- PMID: 40246732
- DOI: 10.1007/s00702-025-02920-4
Phenotypic comparison between combined dystonia-parkinsonism and idiopathic adult-onset dystonia
Abstract
The clinical characteristics of dystonia occurring in association with sporadic neurodegenerative parkinsonism have not been systematically explored or compared with those of idiopathic adult-onset dystonia. This study aims to compare demographic and clinical features, including the distribution of dystonia at onset, dystonia-associated features, and the propensity for spread between patients with combined dystonia-parkinsonism and those with idiopathic adult-onset dystonia. Patients were selected from the Italian Dystonia Registry. The study cohort included 130 patients with combined dystonia-parkinsonism and 355 age- and sex-matched patients with isolated adult-onset idiopathic dystonia. The comparison between combined dystonia-parkinsonism and idiopathic dystonia revealed differences in the distribution of dystonia across body regions, with non-task-specific upper limb dystonia, lower limb dystonia, and trunk dystonia occurring more frequently in patients with combined dystonia-parkinsonism. Additionally, this group exhibited a lower frequency of head tremor, eye symptoms associated with blepharospasm, and sensory tricks, alongside a comparable frequency of neck pain related to cervical dystonia and a family history of dystonia or tremor. The clinical presentation of dystonia differs between combined dystonia-parkinsonism and idiopathic dystonia, especially in terms of the body regions affected. These differences underscore the necessity for additional research and suggest underlying pathophysiological disparities between etiological categories that could significantly influence future diagnostics and therapeutic approaches.
Keywords: Atypical parkinsonism; Combined dystonia-parkinsonism; Idiopathic dystonia; Parkinson’s disease; Phenotypic comparison.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. Ethical approval: The local ethical review board (IRCSS Oncologico of Bari) approved the study (Protocol No. 596, October 24, 2023). The requirement for informed consent was waived because the study was register-based, and individuals were not identifiable at any time. We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.
References
-
- Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB et al (2013) Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord 28(7):863–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25475 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Armstrong MJ et al (2013) Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology 80(5):496–503. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fd1 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Balint B, Mulroy E, Gövert F et al (2021) Development of parkinsonism after long-standing cervical dystonia - a cohort. J Neurol Sci 427:117477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117477 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ben-Shlomo Y, Darweesh S, Llibre-Guerra J, Marras C, San Luciano M, Tanner C (2024) The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 403(10423):283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01419-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Conte A, Rocchi L, Latorre A, Belvisi D, Rothwell JC, Berardelli A (2019) Ten-year reflections on the neurophysiological abnormalities of focal dystonias in humans. Mov Disord 34(11):1616–1628. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27859 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical