Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 17;15(1):13310.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97090-4.

Finite element analysis and clinical evaluation of cross locking external fixator configuration for distal third tibia fracture

Bing Wui Ng  1 , Abdul Hadi Abdul Wahab  2   3 , Abdul Muttalib Abdul Wahid  4 , Nik Nur Ain Azrin Abdullah  5 , Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir  6 , Muhammad Imam Ammarullah  7   8 , Muhammad Hanif Ramlee  9   10
Affiliations

Finite element analysis and clinical evaluation of cross locking external fixator configuration for distal third tibia fracture

Bing Wui Ng et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

External fixators have been used effectively in damage control orthopaedic and open fractures management of various bones. It is well known that stability of external fixators is greatly influenced by its construct. Various rules have been documented to influence the stiffness and stability of external fixators. In this study, two clinical cases treated with a novel concept of cross self-locking rods external fixation construct were being described, coupled with biomechanical analysis of its stability in comparison with other constructs by using finite element study. These novel self-locking rods configuration proven improve strength by applying the same numbers of rod and pin with the delta frame construct in clinical practice. A validated three-dimensional (3D) model of the bone from a previous study was used and external fixator were designed via computer-aided design (CAD) modelling software, Solidworks. A 1500 N load representing the axial load compression during weight bearing was applied to the tibia with the distal segment of the fracture site secured without any movement. The clinical results showed bone healing process with both cases achieving bone union within the acceptable time. The results of the finite element study shows that the double cross self-locking rods construct had better stability since it showed optimum magnitude in relative micromotion (0.18 mm), lowest stress at the fracture site (189 MPa), displacement of fixator (13.4 mm), and stress at the fixator (687 MPa). In conclusion, double cross self-locking design could provide optimum stability of the external fixator construct by providing better stress distribution at the bone and external fixator, minimize displacement and micromotion at fracture fragments.

Keywords: Bone healing; Cross-locking fixator; Finite element; Micromovement; Tibia fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Institutional review board statement: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and ethically approved by National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia (Reference no.: NMRR-20-147-53061(IIR)). Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Declaration of AI use: The authors declare not use AI-assisted technologies in creating this article. Consent for publication: The authors consent for the publication of this manuscript. Transparency statement: The authors affirm that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical picture of external fixation construct with rods crossed and locked at both proximal pins.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiographs of the locking crossed rods done on Patient A.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Boundary condition for analyzing three configurations of external fixator in treating oblique fracture.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Radiographs of the single crossed locked rod in a comminuted distal 1/3 tibia fracture done on Patient B; (a) post-operative and (b) after heal.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Relative micromotion at the fracture region between proximal and distal tibia.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Stress distribution at the fracture region between proximal and distal. Thick line represent boundary for tibia fracture.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Displacement of three configuration of external fixator.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Stress distribution at 3 different configurations of external fixator.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dheenadhayalan, J., Nagashree, V., Devendra, A., Velmurugesan, P. S. & Rajasekaran, S. Management of open fractures: A narrative review. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma.44, 102246. 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102246 (2023). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sen, D. Principles and overview of external fixators in orthopaedic traumatology. In Handbook of Orthopaedic Trauma Implantology 1–23 (Springer, Singapore, 2023). 10.1007/978-981-15-6278-5_16-2.
    1. Rogol, E. V. External fixation for tissue preservation following complex mandible trauma and its sequelae: Reminder of a time-honored method and case series of 23 patients. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol.10.1016/j.oooo.2024.10.113 (2024). - PubMed
    1. Pourabbas, B., Emad, J., Dehghani, J., Heidari, S. & Vosoughi, A. R. Mechanical evaluation of the effect of the rod to rod distance on the stiffness of uniplanar external fixator frames. Musculoskelet. Surg.107, 397–403. 10.1007/s12306-023-00782-1 (2023). - PubMed
    1. Fragomen, A. T. & Rozbruch, S. R. The Mechanics of External Fixation, HSS J. Musculoskelet. J. Hosp. Spec. Surg.3, 13–29. 10.1007/s11420-006-9025-0 (2007). - PMC - PubMed