Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):219.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04040-9.

Studying the effect of keratoconus severity on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using newer keratoconus-specific formulas

Affiliations

Studying the effect of keratoconus severity on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using newer keratoconus-specific formulas

Hany Ahmed Helaly et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: to study the effect of keratoconus severity on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using newer keratoconus (KC) specific formulas.

Methods: This was a retrospective case series that included 99 eyes from 99 patients. The included patients were further subdivided into 3 groups according to keratoconus severity. The results of various IOL power calculation formulas were analyzed in this study. Two KC specific formulas were employed: Barrett True K KC and Kane KC. Additionally, the following formulas were utilized: Barrett Universal II (BUII), EVO 2.0, Hoffer QST, Kane, and PEARL-DGS.

Results: The Kane KC was the only formula to show a myopic mean prediction error (- 0.76 ± 1.06 D). BUII and Barrett True K KC formulas showed the least mean and median absolute errors. The median absolute error (MedAE) for BUII and Barrett True K KC was 0.34 and 0.35 D respectively. BUII and Barrett True K KC formulas had the highest cases within ± 0.25 D of the intended refraction (42.42% and 39.39%, respectively). In severe KC eyes, the MedAE for Barrett True K KC and BUII formulas was 0.56 and 0.46 D respectively. In severe KC eyes, Barrett True K KC and BUII formulas showed the highest cases within ± 0.25 D of the intended refraction (27.27% and 27.27%, respectively).

Conclusion: most non KC specific IOL power calculation formulas perform in an acceptable way in mild KC eyes. In moderate and severe KC eyes, the KC specific formulas perform better than the standard formulas. Barrett True K KC formula performed better than Kane KC in moderate and severe KC eyes. BUII formula was the best performing non KC specific formula in moderate and severe KC eyes.

Keywords: ARGOS; Barrett true K KC; Biometry; IOL power calculation; Kane KC; Keratoconus; Sum-of-segments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt. The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed for this study. All the included patients were recalled for the final follow-up visit and signed an informed consent form. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Consent to publish: Not applicable.

Similar articles

References

    1. -Gomes JAP, Rodrigues PF, Lamazales LL. Keratoconus epidemiology: A review. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2022;36(1):3–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. -Bui AD, Truong A, Pasricha ND, Indaram M. Keratoconus diagnosis and treatment: recent advances and future directions. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:2705–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. -Deshmukh R, Ong ZZ, Rampat R, Del Alió JL, Barua A, Ang M, et al. Management of keratoconus: an updated review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1212314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. -Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Hooshmand E, Saatchi M, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Valadkhan M, Mortazavi M, Hashemi A, Khabazkhoob M. The prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea. 2020;39(2):263–70. - PubMed
    1. -Atalay E, Özalp O, Yıldırım N. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of keratoconus. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021;13. 10.1177/25158414211012796. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources